A Chinese adage says, “One picture worth a thousand words!” Just look at this amazing painting, the description of which is: “Arhats (holy men) Ding Yun Peng. Ming dynasty, 1368 – 1644 AD, red and color on paper.” Here you see perhaps the earliest version of the traditional Chinese Dragon that adorns the roof of almost every temple in China. Will you just look at this 500 year old painting, please? And marvel? [this article is based on the fantastic picture research of Chris Parker from s8int.com/ DO visit his amazing site.]
Now what is so amazing about this picture? Several things. It is probably the oldest version of the oft enhanced temple dragons, yet after 500 years modern temple dragons still feature the same standard characteristics. To wit:
- The square-looking, bearded mouth
- The two thin antenna style feelers
- The deer antler type horns at the back of the head
- The scaled skin
- The fierce round bulging eyes
- The legs sticking out as if to catch the body in any contortion. (though its hind-legs are longer than Chinese dragons today!)
- The crest on the head
- The serrated back
- The row of dorsal spines
- The unscaled ribbed belly
- The three forward clawed feet
Are you saying that from around 1650 AD until 2000 AD, the basic characteristics of Chinese Dragons have scarcely changed? Yup! that is what the evidence says, contrary to modern day historical academia which insists that these are mere “mythical creatures” that perhaps had some basis in reality, but was changed over thousands of years, because of what westerners call the “Chinese telephone” principle!
You know.. you whisper a story in the ear of your neighbour who tells the next one and after 10 people the story is totally changed!
Well such prejudice about Chinese people is quickly debunked here, by the way they faithfully transmitted the basic dragon characteristics over almost 500 years hardly departing from the original!
Perhaps we should rather call it “European Telephone” , considering the way they let the historicity of their own former dragons slip away and morph into “myth” in less than 150 years, because of confused Charlie Darwin who didn’t grasp whispered truth at all!
(Qu)academia will of course relegate the Beowulf account to “myth”, along with gatekeeper Wicked Pedia. Yet Beowulf was true Danish history (that the poor modern Danish probably have been taught to reject as well) but I bet you that it was less embellished than official English WW2 history that made warmongering villain Churchill into a peace hero! What travesty of truth.
This is a testimony to the thorough faithfulness of the Chinese who stuck to their ancient traditions like glue, as if that wasn’t already obvious to most of the world. My goodness! And now modern mainstream politically correct historians want to blame us for not having observed the original animal as carefully as our honourable ancestors surely did?
Hello? What are you smoking?!
Chinese people lived with dragons, trained dragons, used dragons, wrote about dragons, and pictured them just as carefully as the holy Arhats in the Ming picture above from 1650 AD. See below for its full size, and even more shocking ancient paintings of our ancestors using dragons to pull carts, as your Marco Polo testified to having seen in his famous travelogue.
Sad-to-say most Western minds are now so impermeable to truth, due to MS media and academia’s constant crass Darwinian propaganda that they can’t even conceive of live dragons in recent history anymore!
See some more solid documentary proof as witnessed in Chinese art, and it is not just the typical temple dragon either. China had lots of different types of dragons, as the art photos and paintings below will reveal to you.
Check out this obviously “dinosaur”-like looking 2000 yr. old Han dynasty dragon statue which they now call a ‘Theropod’ from “65 million years ago!” S-u-u-u-re. If you believe that, I have a golden bridge for sale for you, in San Francisco. Very cheap!
How about this Tang dynasty Dragon? The Tang Dynasty was around 750 AD, when the Anglo Saxons invaded Britain of the “Welsh!” Not that long ago! Well the British have lots of eye witness accounts of dragons fighting together, or devouring a shepherd and or his sheep. See Geoffrey of Monmouth’s chronicles for that info.
And what about this Song Dynasty dragon statue? The Song (Sung) dynasty (960 – 1279 AD) followed the Tang, and was around the time of the Crusades! Not that long ago! Obviously the Chinese still had and saw dragons! It is a big country after all with lots of room to procreate. Also the silver one below was more anatomically correct than the modern Darwinian conception made from mere bones! They saw this “prosauropod” ‘Long‘ (Chinese for Dragon!) walk, with its knees bending backwards!
Obviously Chinese dragons were not only traditional serpent-like temple roof dragons, but featured many different kinds. They are actually pictured in greater and more accurate detail than the fanciful dinosaur graphic designers of the yellow ‘National Porneographic’ and ‘Science So-called’ magazines, could ever come up with!
How about these Kilins, Qilins or Jilins. Mythical, you say? But how did the ancients come up with the idea? How are you so sure they didn’t frequently see, picture, and described them, before they became extinct?
Lets go back in time now! Have you ever seen a 1700 BC Shang dynasty dragon à la “Tyrannosaurus Rex?” Sure, because of stylising it misses the little front arms, but it is mighty close! Much better skin detail than anything we’ve ever seen on Tyrannos of ancient European art or even in today‘s mainstream media “dino” art! That is one mean looking dragon!
Why so much finer detail? Well, today’s evolutionary artists have nothing more than skeletons and bones to go by, apart from their wild imagination judging by the overly colourful exaggerated models we are forced to see in every “scientific” Darwinian publication and TV program.
Take a look at these amazing paintings from Wu Bing during the Ming Dynasty, only some 500 years ago. This ought to wake some people up out of their media-induced intellectual stupor.
Chinese riding on bulls, oxen, and on dragons!
Erhats riding on dragons and cattle.
Horses(?) and dragons pictured together pulling chariots!
These ancient Chinese artists and sculptors had no dogmatic bone in today’s bloody religious fight between opposing worldviews. They just saw these animals walking around in living color and live nature!
Probably not just from a distance but sometimes in horrifying close proximity, as British (Welsh) King Morvidus experienced, when he was swallowed “like a fish” by a huge dragon that threatened his town, as reported in British history.
The Welsh or Brits saw them actually quite recently.
Just like in Loch Ness Scotland, actually in China you can still see dragons, today! — Marine dragons that is — in Lake Tianchi in N-China! They didn’t die “65 million years ago.” Poppycock!
Of course Darwinian religionists and their historical “experts” have now relegated true history to their favorite realm of “mythology“ – that pseudo-scientific term that rejects all true historical annals and chronicles, as you can find here on our site. Geoffrey of Monmouth, Nennius, Virgil, Holinshed, Annals of Clonmacnoise, Oera Linda Book, Armenian History, Eusebius, and others.
Even Plato gets dissed because he talked about Atlantis.
But who cares! We and thousands of other alternative historians don’t give a hoot anymore what Wicked Pedia or the historical academic elite prescribe as true historicity. Why? Because they are pitiful thought-slaves of today’s hijacked academia that defines which historical accounts are real and kosher by a totally outdated and falsified standard.
Their pathetic Darwinist religion dictates that true historicity revolves around their presumed patriarchy of stone-age, cave-dwelling, knuckle-dragging morons with an IQ of 27. Mainstream historian “luminaries” reduced themselves to blind guides of the blind falling into their own narrow-minded, make-believe little hysterical ditch. Lots of PhD-s and very wise professors like David Berlinsky, John Lennox, Alister McGrath, even former atheist Anthony Flew (in his last years), etc. all make short shrift of this elite propaganda.
Darwinians are so blind that they also dismiss all pre-Columbian global ocean-travel as “non science!” Can you believe it! Whereas Egyptian hieroglyphs are found in Australian caves, Phoenician inscriptions on Argentinian rock faces and many other instances, Chinese coins and porcelain in North America, while pottery from Tiahuanaco features proto-Sumerian writings, and the Chinese left jade in Mexico and stone anchors in San Diego, and Jomon pottery in Equador, while Zheng He –a century before Columbus!- sailed in much bigger ships to E-Africa, Australia, and probably to ‘Fu-Sang’, now wrongly called “America” because of Johnny-come-lately explorer Amerigo Vespucci. SEE: Chinese discovered America!
Chinese porcelain sword found in North America
Columbus boat compared to Zheng He’s ship
Chinese jade the academic called “Olmec” – Looks Chinese to us, not African! Like the statues below, found in a Teotihuacan temple tunnel. Looks Chinese to us, even the clothes! But not to these brainwashed ‘academics’ who only write about Mayans.
Above is ancient Chinese/Japanese Jomon culture pottery compared with virtually identical Ecuadorian Valdivian pottery, as rightly observed by Dr. Betty Meggers of the Smithsonian. Alas, it did not compel them to accept pre-Columbian cross-oceanic contacts & discoveries by Chinese nor anyone else. Why? Because it doesn’t support their preferred Darwinian paradigm that Man was too stupid to cross oceans until 1492 “when Columbus sailed the ocean blue.” Ha! Smell the programming?
A BAD DARWINIAN JOKE?
Let’s face it, not only the mainstream media and even government institutes like NIST (in the case of 9-11!) are hijacked by elitairian globalists, but academia as well! Not just in CO2 phobia in Climate Science, but in many other sciences as well, like geology and biology!
Whatever is not politically correct is quickly denounced as “pseudo-science!” They are more brazenly dictatorial and intolerant than even the Roman Catholic Church ever was in the Galileo affair! They never denounced Galileo’s discoveries “pseudo-science” as far as I remember. They merely tried to minimise his influence on their theology! Later they even renounced their resistance to and adopted Galileo’s science.
But now? The masses are brain-polluted by false historical paradigms hobbled by the paralytic interpretation of history that we are the smartest evolutionary genetic culmination of a long line of ape-like ascendants. What travesty of a naked emperor! It is precisely the opposite.
Before and just after the devastating Global Deluge disaster recorded in over 700 legends and histories collected by now, Man was much smarter than the pitiful left-over of our genetic pool today. Compared to original Man we are like a Chihuahua to a Wolf!
You can almost tell by how modern man has become so gullible and naive that they have hardly any discernment left to see how they are being taken for a religious ride! They don’t even realise how much the media are hijacked and that they’re being lied to! They just hunker down in front of their televisions and swallow all the nonsense that Upcovery Channel and Hysteria Channel are dishing up to them as gospel truth!
Believe me and thousands of alternative scientists and historians, Noah, Shem, Ham (Amun-Ra!), Japheth, Canaan, and their descending early (proto-) Sumerians, Egyptians (Khemites or Hamites), Dravidians of Dwarka, early Chinese, and other early civilisations, sailed the early oceans with astronomical knowledge that modern Europeans only attained to recently!
These post-diluvian survivors of the very smart first Pangaea civilisation were way smarter than dumbed-down modern man, but he’s too proud to admit it. They don’t want to own up to the fact that they’ve been ordinarily brainwashed by the Elitairian mass re-programming campaign of Darwinist “New Speak!”
They are not even intellectually offended by and actually “believe” that they are descended from another species, and swallowed all that real pseudo-science that they are the result from billions of beneficial genetic mutations instead of deleterious ones. When Dawkins was asked to name just one known beneficial gene mutation he couldn’t even come up with one!
So what are you gonna stick with? With this fully fabricated fantasy paradigm designed to dismiss the Creator of our Universe in order to enslave humanity? Or can you still get your brain genes together enough to realise that we’ve been had on a frigging grand and gross scale! If you do not, you’ve already been neutered and enslaved, and you might as well get a chip and go down the drain. I’m sorry for you.
But if you can shake the fake programming, then there is hope for you. You may recognise our true history and your true patriarchs and their bloodlines, who fought and struggled and defeated “dinosaurs” or as they were/are rightfully called… Dragons!
Chinese are not stupid and even honour dragons as mighty creatures of God, even though some of our Academia here have also been hijacked by dim Darwinism, especially in atheist Darwinian Communist China of course. But not all yet, thank God, and many are waking up out of their enforced state of educational slumber.
Are you? We sure hope so.
8 thoughts on “Ancient Chinese Dragons Rehabilitated from Myth to Historic Reality”
Brother, Do you think mankind killed all the dragons(dinosaurs)?
Wow Richard Dawkins! You’re an idiot. So educated yet so blind. You cannot prove a single theory. You fall back on billions of years of evolution? The evidence is all around you, yet you ignore it. You may be responsible for leading millions of people to their eternal deaths! That is a big millstone tied around your neck!!! You will face GOD and you will be held accountable for your words and your actions. Go have a cigar and a brandy with all your ignorant friends. Laugh and pat each other on the back, Dumb ass wake up!!!!!
To the writer: Thank you for your piece. It put together some interesting evidence that I had not read about before tonight. Moreover, as I read down through the comments, I thought about this: If we desire to actually reach scientists who espouse Darwinism, we must realize that referring to them as idiots etc will just entrench them in their beliefs. Remember: There for the grace of God go I. I could have been raised in a home that did not believe in God and which espoused the ideas of Darwinism. How would we want people to reach out to us? I can not recall a single person who, while using invective or holding me before God on judgment day, has changed my mind about anything. (And, as a Christian I have had interactions with other Christians who treated me this way. It was not effective.) This Web site is about empowering people with evidence that will support their faith, while also giving them the tools to reach the lost. At any rate it is just a thought.
Hi Lisa, I hear you.
There is a balance between virulent scourging of the likes like Darwin Dawkins, and the passive “excuse me for living” polite “but but, well”, and the boorish put-downs of Kent Hovind, “stupid morons” etc. Sometimes I am gentle, or gentler, or passive, and sometimes I roast them with a quip like, “They aren’t even intellectually offended” by Darwinism. I call them (qu)academics sometimes, and you are right it might turn off some people who do not KNOW how quacademic “academia” really is, as they are still at the beginning of waking up to smell the (qu)offee. Ha!
BUT, sometimes, we need to answer a fool acc. to their folly, and sometimes NOT answer a fool acc. to his folly, in order not t be like him. (2 actual proverbs from the namesake book). Sometimes I am angry because i realise again how deep the deception was and is, and how we have been deceived so grossly by so-called intellectuals, living under their self appointed superiority.
In fact I have little hope of changing the established (qu)academics’ minds, as they are too deeply entrenched and lit. brain polluted by the ridiculous Darwinian paradigm. the prescribed tax supported worldview of the elite control freaks who control “edyoucashin”. I write mainly for the poor pitiful victims of this intellectual skullduggery (LIT), (like my former self) and give them ammo to shoot at the selfrighteous Humanist hypocrites that are basically doing it ALL for the LOVE of money, the GLORY of Man, and the worship of SELF. Don’t give them an inch!
So … balance? Well some articles are “nice” where as others might be a tad “scathing”. I think we should ALL be VERY MAD AS HELL at the LIES and stand up against them. Maybe you are called to do it nicely. But I warn you the Marxist hegemonists are normally NOT very NICE, to say it softly, but they don’t think twice about murdering you if you don’t agree. Look at the billions already murdered by them in the last 100 years. Of course there are always exceptions, that proverbially, establish the rule.
But thank you for your kind comment.
Love & Mercy