Some lightweight liberal Marxist at Russia Today exhausted his literary prowess on yet another ‘tongue in cheek’ hit piece to ridicule the proven historicity of the ancient
2345 3000 BC Global Flood and its universally recognised Eight Survivors. This time “Noah used his cell phone to call one of his three sons aboard” and other such inane nonsense.
According to this scientifically challenged writer “The story of Noah’s Ark has been the subject of scrutiny and conspiracy theories for decades.”
IF the historical Global Flood – attested to by more than 700 global ethnic legends and providing the only sensible explanation of the mysterious ubiquitous 2 KM deep fossil-studded layers below our feet – had indeed been treated with scientific scrutiny, it certainly was not done by this inane writer. Read it for yourself!
RT, Instead of really questioning more, treats us to a tabloid style ‘scientific’ sh*t piece that even a Sunday Express or Daily Mail would toss into file Z, rather than in their Science section, and fire the rookie that wrote this nonsense.
He didn’t quote any serious geological or historical facts that have been gathered eversince we were polluted by the fake science that species can change into other species, based on such a thing as a “geological column” that can’t be found or observed anywhere in the confusion of strata, on which the entire construct and longevity of Darwinism is founded.
Darwinism is so outdated, proven false, and rejected by many PhD-s intellectuals, and professors, that Prof. David Berlinski – who isn’t even a Christian- blows it out of the water with his sharp analysis, as “a preposterous laughable theory, not even a scientific theory!”
It is a FAILED MODEL or faulty paradigm!
IF Darwinian natural selection cannot account for the super-rich complexity and diversity of creations, then we do NOT descend via primates, cavemen, and hunter gatherers into “Homo Sapiens Sapiens!” (These cavemen are squatting, because they’re still evolving from quadruped primates!)
So then the question is, where DID we really originate? That’s where true historical science steps in to give us solid answers. What did the Ancients themselves say? Here are some pertinent points we can throw in the face of these fake media nay-sayers; And if you want more, they are all over the articles you can find here at Ancient Patriarchs.
ALL ancient civilisations and more than 700 ethnic global tribes testified of a historical flood!
Sumerians, Egyptians, Hebrews, Persians, Indians, Aztecs, Incas, Chinese, etc. And if they all testified of this Flood then they are the children of the survivors. And if there are survivors, they must have had divine warning to save all our surviving animals as well, And the ONLY sensible way – without considering a giant UFO like some do – they must have floated on some huge boat! And guess what! Many tribes say exactly that, Man survived on a boat, although often in diminished form like the house outrigger canoe of the Hawaiians or the floating log of the Australian aborigines. Nevertheless their forefathers survived on them all.
ALL tribes and nations testified of A NOAH, even similar sounding:
Hebrews Noach, Chinese NuWa. India MaNU and Satyaphrata, Greeks Ouranoh, Egyptians Nun, Miao Zu Nuah, Hawaii Nu-Uh, Turks, Arabs & Persians Nur, Sumerians Atrahasis or Utnapishtim, and the list goes on. For more details go here.
Many testified of three sons with similar names:
Indians: Sharma, Charma, Yapethi,
Hebrews: Shem, Cham, Yapheth,
Miao: Lo Shen, Lo Han, Yaphu,
Syrian Sham & Cham, Romans: Yupiter
Many spoke of EIGHT survivors on a boat:
China: The Eight Xian Enlightened Ones & 3 August Ones & 5 Emperors make eight.
India: Manu and his 7 Rishis, make eight
Egyptians: The 8 Ogdoad: Nun, Nut, and 3 sons plus 3 wives, is eight.
Sumerians: Oannes and his 7 Apakallus, on a boat.
Hebrews, Noah, wife, Shem, Cham, Yapeth and 3 wives, make 8.
But what does a brainwashed propagandised RT liberal Marxist know about such historical realities. He probably swears by the fake Darwinian epochs timeline of Paleozoic, Jurassic, Cambrian, and all its other fake eras, totally falsified by the fossilised trees that ostensibly grew through layers of by-millions-of-years separated eras!
You have to have a strong confirmation bias to believe all that. Especially in light of the trees found bobbing vertically and settling on the bottom of Spirit Lake after Mt. St. Helen blew up!
Also the poor journalism graduate obviously never heard of the circular reasoning behind the dating of the fossils and the layers. The layers are dated by the key fossils, and the key fossils are dated by the layers. Who can refute such science. Ha!
The poor reporter probably never even knew that fact. Plainly because he never really looked into it, doing his journalistic homework. No, he only heard the smarmy ridicule of his Marxist colleagues at the RT office about “fundamentalist Christians and their Ark!“, not realising that many serious scientists without any religious agenda did some thorough research on the subject.
But those are not talked about, because that appears to be taboo in mainstream fake media circles. After all if it smacks of supernatural origins and Creation which All ancients testified about and believed, then it is anathema, and a ‘No Go Zone’. Only when Putin ostensibly frequents Orthodox Church to kiss the crucifix and icons it won’t be ridiculed, but it is not kosher to seriously report on what all the Ancients believed, and thorough research revealed.
Even though the global fault lines stare them in the skeptic face as scars of Earth’s violent catastrophic geological volcanic past, which totally refutes the official Uniformitarian policy of (qu)academia that ‘the present is the key to the past’, it is silently swept under the rug. For that see Walter Brown’s hydroplate theory, HERE!
You Mean They Have A Silent Agenda?
Well the inane writer brought it up himself as the big argument to disarm Flood Theory by using the old CIA canard of ‘Conspiracy Theory!’ Remember he said, “The story of Noah’s Ark has been the subject of scrutiny and conspiracy theories for decades.”
Conspiracy theories? No theories at all! Merely the historical facts that the mainstream media policies and official propaganda were the fruit of a Round Table pipe dream conjured up by the British elite during the 19 hundreds to rid the world of true history, biology, and geology, by replacing it with the fake science of Lyell, Hutton, Darwin, Huxley, and all their elitairian ilk, in order to rid the world of the true knowledge of the most factual Middle Eastern history Book, called Genesis, written by Egyptian trained & sourced Moses who also had access to Hebrew and Sumerian history sources. Why didn’t the 20th Century British elite and the 21st Century RT editorial staff believe his writings?
For the same reason that Aldous Huxley stated at the Darwinian Congress in Chicago so many years ago, “Not to let Spirituality have a foot in the door”
“The philosopher who finds no meaning in the world is not concerned exclusively with a problem in pure metaphysics. He is also concerned to prove that there is no valid reason why he personally should not do as he wants to do, or why his friends should not seize political power and govern in the way that they find most advantageous to themselves. The voluntary…reasons for holding doctrines of materialism…may be predominantly erotic, as they were in the case of Lamettrie…or predominantly political as they were in the case of Karl Marx.” (Aldous Huxley, “Ends and Means,” p. 315, from Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control, E. Michael Jones, p. 27)
“…one belief that all true original Darwinians held in common, and that was their rejection of creationism, their rejection of special creation. This was the flag around which they assembled and under which they marched…. The conviction that the diversity of the natural world was the result of natural processes and not the work of God was the idea that brought all the so-called Darwinians together in spite of their disagreements on other of Darwin’s theories.” (One Long Argument, 1991, p. 99, Ernst Mayr (d. 2005), Professor of Zoology at Harvard University)
“We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism. It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is an absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door.” (“Billions and Billions of Demons,” Richard Lewontin, PhD Zoology, Alexander Agassiz Research Professor at Harvard University)
For example, Aldous Huxley wrote:
I had motives for not wanting the world to have meaning; consequently, assumed it had none, and was able without any difficulty to find satisfying reasons for this assumption…. The philosopher who finds no meaning in the world is not concerned exclusively with a problem in pure metaphysics; he is also concerned to prove there is no valid reason why he personally should not do as he wants to do…. For myself, as no doubt for most of my contemporaries, the philosophy of meaninglessness was essentially an instrument of liberation. The liberation we desired was simultaneously liberation from a certain political and economic system and liberation from a certain system of morality. We objected to the morality because it interfered with our sexual freedom (1966, 3:19, emp. added).
And so it is the same old Marxist agenda with which this cheap article by this unscientific RT Journalist can agree, because they are – after all – all tailored of the same cloth. which reminds me of the tailors of the Emperor who thought he had the most beautiful clothes, while in fact he walked stark naked. And all the browbeaten subjects crowed in unison that it was so beautiful, until one little boy spoke out with the voice of truth, The Emperor is naked!”