THE VIDEO AT THE END OF THE ARTICLE IS VERY WORTH WATCHING!!!
Brien Foerster has done tons of research on elongated skulls and this video shows many of the results of his work. Elongated skulls are NOT the result of head-binding cultures, as Darwinian trained archaeologists surmise, as the elongated skulls are elongated from the womb, as the video will show you, and they don’t have the normal sutures on top of the skulls but are closed on top, apart from all the other differences and anomalies. The mystery of course is where did these elongated skull humans originated from?
As much as I admire Brien Foerster’s tenacious research and passion to show (qu)academia that they are …
obfuscating true research into these anomalous skulls
denying early oceanic crossings of humans & these kind of humans originating in Europe or Middle East around the Caspian and Black Seas..
Ignoring these skulls by NOT subjecting them to rigorous & honest genetic DNA analysis..
confusing the later ‘Indian’ Incas to these skulls via their bogus head binding theory.
I draw different conclusions than Foerster because we each come from totally different worldviews and scientific paradigms. I will explain:
We know giant graves were found on the Fiji island of Rotuma, on Pulau Upeh island in Malaysia, on Easter island, the Aleutians, and in Hawaii, as you can read in our other articles, all over the Pacific, but also in the Solomon islands. The reports of giants are suppressed by mainstream academia for ideological reasons, to uphold debunked Darwinism, as living giants do not fit their official narrative & mass propaganda.
DNA testings have been done on the Paracas skulls that are different than normal human skulls in that they don’t have ‘Sagittal Sutures’ between the skull plates but rather a dome like closed top.
They are not totally human. Mr. L.A.Marzulli and History Channel (of course) disagree on their origins, in that History Channel – as good NWO puppets – believe they originate from “Aliens” whereas they are most likely descendants of the so-called Nephilim giants that infested Canaan and Bashan and other places in the Middle East around 1500 BC. Of course such Bible corroborating results are anathema, as they are not “politically correct”, in other words in line with the Academia ruling Marxist atheist narrative. ENJOY the video. Continue reading Paracas Skulls DNA Analysis Shows European & Mid Eastern DNA but Researchers Disagree→
As you can see, Google put us down a notch over the last week or so, – in their wicked drive to stop alternative news! – as the stats show, and so we advertise here with our most popular links, we hope you will look at and spread to others: And for GOD’s sake STOP USING GULAG the Truth Suppresser, Truth Hater, Corporate Collectivist Marxist Shill of shills!
AP EDITOR INTRODUCTION: In the past ‘Continental Drift’ was not popular and considered a fairy tale. But then it was recently proven that indeed the continents had drifted away from each other. Therefore the ‘scientists’ were hard up to find a scientific solution to this phenomenon. And so they came up with “Plate tectonics” as a recent initial ‘explanation’ to the enigma of the continents looking like they fit together. Plate tectonics has certain components that are based on guesswork, like subduction for example. The “subduction” theory surmised that the continental plates would slip under other plates and bend downward and melt in the magma under the plates, where as at other places the plates would come and be formed from under other plates. Then comes along Dr. Smoot who mapped the earth’s entire ocean floor over 35 years and discovered that subduction does not happen at all, and the theory is bogus. WHY do Darwinian scientists hold on to the theory? Because the only other theory that is observed and does make sense is the so-called ‘Hydroplate Theory’ of Dr. Walt Brown, but blasted, “Brown is a creationist.” Voila! That’s why they hold on to a disproven theory. Enjoy Dr. Walt Brown’s And Smoot’s explanation:
By Dr. Walt Brown
Ocean floors constitute 70% of earth’s solid surface. They were largely unexplored between 1957 and 1970, when the plate tectonic (PT) theory was developed. It was frequently said that we knew more about Mars than about the ocean floor. As a result, the PT theory, which primarily attempts to explain features on the ocean floor, was developed in the blind, without the data needed to formulate it or test it. Why then was plate tectonics accepted with enthusiasm?
A Brewing Crisis. Before PT, the only theory that tried to explain earth’s major surface features was the 1912 continental drift theory. It claimed, as its name implies, that the amazing and obvious jig-saw fit of the east coast of the Americas with the west coast of Europe and Africa is because the continents drifted apart. No one knew why a supercontinent broke apart or how the pieces could move. Did thousands of miles of solid rock plow through thousands of miles of solid rock? Why couldn’t the earth-science experts explain the fit that the public could plainly see? (You who have read pages 110–434, now understand all that—and much more.) Continue reading Does Recently (2012) Declassified Data Falsify Plate Tectonics?→
Remains of an ancient race of giants were reportedly uncovered on Catalina Island in the early 1900’s
CHANNEL ISLANDS — Between the years of 1919 and 1928, archeologist Ralph Glidden claims to have discovered the ancient remains of a race of giants which may have inhabited islands off of the coast of California.
By Jon R. Haskell, Indigenous Peoples Research Foundation
Graphic Above: Two sides of a jade disk, about 2.5 inches in diameter, found in Harrison County, Ky. The red arrows on the right point to dragon and bird motifs. (Courtesy of Jon R. Haskell/www.Precontact.org)
What may be an ancient Chinese artifact mysteriously appeared in a small garden next to a pond, on a heavily wooded acreage in a remote and sparsely populated area of Harrison County, Ky.
“It was just laying there,” said the finder, recalling the moment two years ago when his quest began to understand what the disc is and how it got in his garden. It’s been a frustrating, inconclusive quest. With a look on his face of expecting me to have all the answers, he asked, “How do you think it got here?”
Archaeologists have been surprised by the strange finding of ancient Roman coins, buried in the ruins of a castle located in Japan. The four copper coins were unearthed from the soil beneath Katsuren Castle on Okinawa Island.
Here’s one surprise you should enjoy. Test your knowledge.
HOW BIG WERE ANCIENT SHIPS?
What about Christopher Columbus’ ships? Do you know, Columbus’ whole expedition could mount only 88 men. These were separated onto three ships. Two of these ships were only 50 feet in length, about the size of a small fishing boat. Okay, that’s easy to picture.
Now, let’s get into a time machine, so to speak, and travel back further… further… further… Back to ancient Greece. When we think of ancient battleships, we think of the tiny ships shown in a movie like Ben Hur. They had 50 or so men, and a single tier of oars. That may reflect our evolutionary thinking that the ancients, compared to us, were primitive. Continue reading The Ignored Amazingly Huge Ships of Ancient History→
Now in Malacca in an island Pulau Upeh in Malaysia, Did you ever hear from academics in the history department that evidence of giants had been found in South East Asia? Most certainly not! Not from mainstream historians that is.
But Malaysia is surely not the first place giant skeletons or graves have been found. Skeletons have been found all over the Pacific and graves, like in Rotuma (see top picture), sightings even in the Solomon Islands, as well as the find of one of the most giant skulls ever, in the Aleutian islands, and giant remains in Hawaii. See news article below:
Characters, Origins, Identities, Exploits & Legends of Early Patriarchs on Post Flood Earth! GOING WHERE THE EVIDENCE LEADS US, while seriously kicking quackademic ass because it deserves it for suppressing so many historical truths!