Category Archives: Dragons

The Norwegian lake monsters

People who have lived all their life by the Snåsa lake in Nord-Trøndelag have seen things they can not explain.

July 3, 2005, Einar Johannes Sandnes was on a fishing trip by the Snåsa lake along with a friend. They had settled down at the lake’s shore to have a cup of coffee and enjoy the weather.

Sandnes sat with his back to the water as he turned around and saw something. He had the mobile phone in his hand and took a picture.

The picture was first known to the public a year and a half later, in newspaper articles in Snåsningen and Adresseavisen. Sandnes told the newspaper in 2007 that the creature was 15-20 meters away when he took the picture. Continue reading The Norwegian lake monsters

Advertisements

‘Carbon-14-dated dinosaur bones less than 40,000 years old’ report scrapped from conference website

Carbon-14-dated dinosaur bones are less than 40,000 years old. Researchers have found a reason for the puzzling survival of soft tissue and collagen in dinosaur bones – the bones are younger than anyone ever guessed.  Carbon-14 (C-14) dating of multiple samples of bone from 8 dinosaurs found in Texas, Alaska, Colorado, and Montana revealed that they are only 22,000 to 39,000 years old.

Members of the Paleochronology group presented their findings at the 2012 Western Pacific Geophysics Meeting in Singapore, August 13-17, a conference of the American Geophysical Union (AGU) and the Asia Oceania Geosciences Society (AOGS).

Since dinosaurs are thought to be over 65 million years old, the news is stunning – and more than some can tolerate.  After the AOGS-AGU conference in Singapore, the abstract was removed from the conference website by two chairmen because they could not accept the findings.  Unwilling to challenge the data openly, they erased the report from public view without a word to the authors.  When the authors inquired, they received this letter:

“There is obviously an error in these data. The abstract was apparently noot reviewed properly and was accepted in error. For this reason  we have exercised our authority as program chairs and rescinded the abstract .. will no longer appear on the AOGS web site.” Minhan Dai & Peter Swart.

They did not look at the data and they never spoke with the researchers.  They did not like the test results, so they censored them. Continue reading ‘Carbon-14-dated dinosaur bones less than 40,000 years old’ report scrapped from conference website

New Research: Dinosaur bones only tens of thousands years old, not millions!

Well, the REAL research results are in, and guess what, it’s of course studiously ignored by mainstream ‘historians’, ‘biologists’, and media naturally!  Empirical research from the ‘Georgia Center of Applied Isotope Studies’ on the collagen breakdown of dinosaur bones has come to the (for us not so) startling conclusion that dinosaurs are only at the most some tens of thousands years old, not millions.

Wasn’t the “65 million yr. old extinction” of the ‘dinos’ – for 5 millennia called dragons! – the first building block of Darwinian morphology of species, as promoted in the 18 hundreds by English banker scion John Lubbock?  Well it seems, metaphorically speaking, that this “rusted  T-Ford” of supposed “Macro-Evolution” on which all later ‘evolutionary models’ were based ostensibly, appears to still stand around,  in an old weed-overgrown garage from the roaring twenties, rather than in some mythical prehistory that never existed.

Continue reading New Research: Dinosaur bones only tens of thousands years old, not millions!

La photo du ptérosaure prise pendant la guerre civile que personne ne devrait voir! “- A lire!

Par Lu Paradise • June 19, 2013 • 0 Comments •  1,233 views
Cet article important et très interessant et maintenant encore pas traduit parfaitement, mais en train d’être finalisé!  SVP ayez patience, autrement retourne apres.  Ici en Anglais. Ici en Allemand. Ici en Espagnol. Ici en Hollandais, et ici en Chinois Traditionel 中文
Also available in English as fully illustrated PPS Powerpoint Presentation 1,6 MB here! Ou comme video en Anglais ici.

Il y a une très vieille photo que personne ne peut voir! Ce n’est pas qu’elle n’existe pas,-elle existe bien!, mais personne n’est vraiment permis de la voir par la «police de la pensée». (George Orwell 1984) Mais même quand les gens la voient, nombreux ne peuvent pas la voir telle qu’elle est vraiment! Au moins, très peu d’entre eux. J’espère que vous le pouvez! Permettez-moi de vous expliquer les faits…

pterahead2Quand une pieuvre est menacée, elle expulse un nuage d’encre dans le visage de son poursuivant. La pieuvre est toujours là, mais devient temporairement invisible derrière son nuage d’encre pendant qu’elle s’échappe. Continue reading La photo du ptérosaure prise pendant la guerre civile que personne ne devrait voir! “- A lire!

Das Bürgerkrieg Pteranodon Bild das Niemand sehen soll!”- Unbedingt Lesen!

By Lu Paradise – March 20, 2010  – 562 total views

War es jemals zuvor so wichtig ein Foto zu fälschen? (übersetzt vom English bei Fei Li Mau) Auch in Holländisch pterahead2Es gibt ein sehr altes Foto, das niemand sehen kann! Es existiert dennoch, das steht außer Frage. Aber die „Gedankenpolizei“ (George Orwell 1984) hat verboten, es zu sehen. Und selbst wenn die Leute es sehen, sehen sie nicht die Wirklichkeit. Schon lange haben sie verlernt richtig wahr-zu-nehmen. Ich hoffe, du lässt dich nicht täuschen!

Was tut ein Tintenfisch, wenn er bedroht wird? Er spritzt Tinte ins Gesicht seines Verfolgers. Der Tintenfisch ist noch immer da, doch wird er für den Gegner unsichtbar! Die gewonnene Zeit nützt der Tintenfisch dann um zu verschwinden. Continue reading Das Bürgerkrieg Pteranodon Bild das Niemand sehen soll!”- Unbedingt Lesen!

De Burgeroorlog pterosaur Photo die niemand zien mag! “ – Dit moet u lezen!

By Lu Paradise — 224 total views –January 24, 2011

De meest verduisterde foto in de geschiedenis? [Translated from English and here in Spanish]
Er bestaat een zeer oude foto die niemand kan zien! Niet dat hij niet bestaat! Hij bestaat wel degelijk. Maar niemand mag hem echt zien van de “Gedachte Politie”. (1984 George Orwell) Zelfs wanneer mensen hem zien, kunnen velen hem nog niet echt zien zoals hij is! Tenminste heel weinigen onder hen. Ik hoop dat u het kunt! Sta mij toe om het tafereel te schetsen…

pterahead2

Wanneer een octopus bedreigd wordt, spuwt hij een verwarrende wolk inkt in het gezicht van zijn achtervolger. De inktvis is er nog wel, maar wordt onzichtbaar achter een wolk van inkt terwijl hij zijn ontsnapping maakt.points-to-head-James-FilesJames File wijst naar zijn slaap waar hij Kennedy doodschoot

Het is eender aan hoe “De Bestaande Machten” (DBM) vaak een ware historische gebeurtenis in een onduidelijke, verwarrende gebeurtenis veranderen, verduisterd door paginas met druk inkt, vol tegenstrijdige commentaren, opinies, en verwarrend gekwetter. Continue reading De Burgeroorlog pterosaur Photo die niemand zien mag! “ – Dit moet u lezen!

UPDATED! What’s The Cover Up About Antarctica? Not jumping to conclusions!

Yes, I wouldn’t be surprised that they did find something there under that Antarctic ice cover. Look at the pyramid above. All these famous guys going down there, obviously to see some amazing sights, the secret big issue, because obviously they are not going to let us in on it, if ever. But John Kerry, Putin, patriarch Krill, Buzz Aldrin, and some other guys, just couldn’t control their curiosity and just had to get their passes to get their asses down there to behold the spectacle.

Sure, it may just be a former U-boat base or a German UFO base of under the ice, the old Schwaben Land, but who knows, maybe it is more mundane then that! As I am very interested in all the historical cover-ups and forbidden archaeology, it wouldn’t surprise me one bit that they found stuff that is not good for mass consumption, because it would defy the dumb fake theory of Darwinism? Because that is what all the historical cover-ups are all about, to protect the “theory of evolution!” Continue reading UPDATED! What’s The Cover Up About Antarctica? Not jumping to conclusions!

Could the “Mythological” Tarasque Have Been A Living Ankylosaurid Dinosaur?

By Lu Paradise – June 23, 2010

The earliest Life of St Martha was written in Latin at some time between 1187 and 1212. One episode tells how, soon after coming to Tarascon, she heard that people there were terrorised by ‘a huge dragon, part land animal and part fish’ which lived in a forest beside the Rhône and had killed many people passing the spot or crossing the river. Attempts to destroy it always failed, since it would hide underwater. The description of the monster is vivid and detailed, and by no means that of a conventional dragon:

For More on this legend (not myth!) from Tarascon in France and the Tarasque beast see the article at the end.

tarasque1-small-300x167

Photo: Phot Blanchin, Tarascon circa 1900 Continue reading Could the “Mythological” Tarasque Have Been A Living Ankylosaurid Dinosaur?

Massive Dinosaur Soft Tissue Discovery In China – Includes Skin And Feathers!

By Michael Snyder

dinobloodcellsA fossil bed in China that is being called “Jurassic Park” has yielded perhaps the greatest dinosaur soft tissue discovery of all time.  According to media reports, “nearly-complete skeletons” have been discovered that even include skin and feathers.  But of course if these dinosaurs are really “160 million years old”, that should be absolutely impossible.  Needless to say, this shocking discovery is once again going to have paleontologists scrambling to find a way to prop up the popular myths that they have been promoting.  What they have been telling us simply does not fit the facts.  The truth is that this latest find is even more evidence that dinosaurs are far, far younger than we have traditionally been taught. Continue reading Massive Dinosaur Soft Tissue Discovery In China – Includes Skin And Feathers!

Open Letter to Rixon Steward Concerning Graham Hancock’s Darwinian, but NOT Alternative History

Because I could not find a way to convey this to him by posting as comment on his website, I will have to post it myself and mention the name of Graham Hancock after all as well. Hopefully it will help him to see the light of the errors of his “alternative” ways. Here is Hancock’s faulty video, Rixon posted on his alternative site:
(Warning: Don’t be sucked in by this Revised Neo Darwinism)


INDEED THEY ARE ALL LIES !

Dear Rixon Steward,

I’ve been visiting your news blog the last ten years & have had a presence on the web myself, already since 2001 as powerpointparadise.com, and lately here as ancientpatriarchs.wordpress.com

I saw your latest promotion of a video by a presumed alternative historian, but I just had to write you as I have a very different take on alternative ancient history than him. I would therefore like to bring to your attention the following points: Continue reading Open Letter to Rixon Steward Concerning Graham Hancock’s Darwinian, but NOT Alternative History