Category Archives: Propaganda

The Secret of Mysterious Megalith Stone Construction Revealed!

Sakkara Vases, Rock Footprints & Megaliths All Prove Still Soft Rock!

pot

30.000 perfect stone vessels hard as iron!

SakkaraStepPyramidA mysterious Engima! Thirty thousand vases and vessels were found beneath the Sakkara Step Pyramid made of rock material harder than steel, of slate, diorite & basalt – the stuff our Earth’s tough mantle is made of. How in the world did the ancient Egyptians ever shape such vases? There are no tool marks on it! They could only have been molded by hand. Does that mean that slate, diorite, and basalt, were once soft materials? — Read on and find out!

Continue reading The Secret of Mysterious Megalith Stone Construction Revealed!

Problems with a Global Flood? (We haven’t heard of any!)

PP Editor: ALTHOUGH (as most of you know) I AM NOT A REACTIONARY ‘CREATIONIST’, I like this rebuttal of fault seeking “consensus science” Darwinian skeptics. Enjoy!
(a Creationist rebuttal of Mark Isaak’s “Problems with a Global Flood” FAQ in the Talk.Origins Archive) © 1998-2015 J. Sarfati & Creation Ministries International. All Rights Reserved.

M any are familiar with Talk.Origins, counted among the top pro-evolution sites on the Internet. Most of the people running it are ostensibly atheistic.  Many had a Christian upbringing and are using evolution as a pseudo-intellectual justification for their apostasy.  But they realise that rank atheism is repugnant to many, so they publish articles claiming that you can believe in God and evolution.  It’s quite a sight to see people, known personally to us as rabidly hostile to Christianity, yet who are eager to assure inquirers that many Christians accept evolution.  It reminds me of Lenin’s strategy of cultivating useful idiots in the West, who were too gullible to realise that they were undermining their own foundations.  See also The Skeptics and their Churchian Allies In one sense, it’s good to see articles like that by Mark Isaak, where the author displays his contempt for Scripture [and I don’t simply mean questioning biblical literalism, but direct mocking attacks against the Christian belief that the Bible is the inerrant written Word of God that “cannot be broken” as Christ Himself believed (John 10:35)], yet feigns concern that “a global flood makes the whole Bible less credible.” How do police investigators normally treat statements by witnesses who are blatantly dishonest?

The serious and objective student of this topic would definitely find it worthwhile purchasing John Woodmorappe’s book Noah’s Ark: A Feasibility Study, which answers most of the other objections.  Isaak has supposedly “updated” his article to give the impression that he has responded to Woodmorappe.  But it’s interesting to compare the two, and see that Isaak has hardly read Woodmorappe, who had more scholarship on each page than Isaak had in his whole article. Continue reading Problems with a Global Flood? (We haven’t heard of any!)

Darwinian Propaganda of National Geographic Erases Global Flood by Black Sea Inundation

NationalGeographicLies

You can’t really depend on National Geographics for proper science. Their “news” is perennially handicapped by Darwinitis. Take this article for example minimising the in 700 legends and narratives documented Global Flood by trying to replace it with one of many Post Ice Age local floods; The Black Sea inundation.

Anapa8It proposes that the Black Sea overflow “spawned” the tale of Noah’s Flood and other inundation folklore”, whereas the Black Sea inundation happened around 1500 BC during the Bronze Age, as seen from the submerged polygonic megaliths under the Black sea off the coast of Anapa City’s and Sochy. Continue reading Darwinian Propaganda of National Geographic Erases Global Flood by Black Sea Inundation

An Evolution Worshipper’s Ode!

January 6, 2010 By Lu Paradise

Oh Holy Evolution! Our powerful God!

Thou art our evolver! Thou hast evolved us over billions of years. Slow art thou! Help us to be like thee. Slow but sure. Thy work is unobserved by us mortals, so slow is it. So slow, that the wicked refute that thou livest! But how can the wicked say that thou livest not? For behold, thou hast evolved us all. Even the wicked who do not see the lenght of time that thou needest.

Thou verily art a time consuming God! Thou movest slower than the clock. Thy increments, thy mutations, the movement of the genes, thou hidest in billions of years. Thou art the slowest of them all. Have the wicked no patience?–To detect the traces of thy movements, o Holy Evolution?

ape-man-line-up
Continue reading An Evolution Worshipper’s Ode!

The Godlike Atttributes Of Darwinian Evolution

by Lu Paradise • June 12, 2014

darwin_punkrock“Evolution endures as the organizing principle of all biological science.”

http://www.fossilmuseum.net/Evolution/Darwin.htm

“Charles Darwin’s extraordinarily difficult task was to find a source of intelligence—a substitute god—to explain how all of life could display countless features that clearly look like they were chosen for specific purposes by intelligence—but not God’s intelligence. “Natural selection” was his extraordinarily clever explanation.” — Darwin’s Sacred Imposter: Recognizing Missed Warning Signs by Randy J. Guliuzza, P.E., M.D.

“A quite general issue has still received no canonical treatment: what kind of a thing is natural selection anyway? A law, a principle, a force, a cause, an agent, or all or some of these things? The view that natural selection is a law has been countered by the view that it is a principle, while that conclusion has been countered in turn by an insistence that it is neither.
 — Hodge, M. J. S. 1992. Natural Selection: Historical Perspectives. Keywords in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 218.

What kind of a thing is natural selection anyway?

“An organizing principle!”
“A source of intelligence, but not God!”
“A law, a principle, a force, a cause, an agent, or all or some of these things?” Continue reading The Godlike Atttributes Of Darwinian Evolution

Archaeological Cover-ups: A Plot to Control History?

By Will Hart

Description: The scientific establishment tends to reject, suppress or ignore evidence that conflicts with accepted theories, while denigrating or persecuting the messenger.

THE BRAIN POLICE” AND “THE BIG LIE

Any time you allege a conspiracy is afoot, especially in the field of science, you are treading on thin ice. We tend to be very sceptical about conspiracies–unless the Mafia or some Muslim radicals are behind the alleged plot. But the evidence is overwhelming and the irony is that much of it is in plain view.

The good news is that the players are obvious. Their game plan and even their play-by-play tactics are transparent, once you learn to spot them. However, it is not so easy to penetrate through the smokescreen of propaganda and disinformation to get to their underlying motives and goals. It would be convenient if we could point to a plumber’s unit and a boldface liar like Richard Nixon, but this is a more subtle operation. Continue reading Archaeological Cover-ups: A Plot to Control History?