Category Archives: Propaganda

The Latest Elongated Skull Video & Our Different Conclusions than Brien Foerster

THE VIDEO AT THE END OF THE ARTICLE IS VERY WORTH WATCHING!!!


Brien Foerster has done tons of research on elongated skulls and this video shows many of the results of his work. Elongated skulls are NOT the result of head-binding cultures, as Darwinian trained archaeologists surmise, as the elongated skulls are elongated from the womb, as the video will show you, and they don’t have the normal sutures on top of the skulls but are closed on top, apart from all the other differences and anomalies. The mystery of course is where did these elongated skull humans originated from?

As much as I admire Brien Foerster’s tenacious research and passion to show (qu)academia that they are …

  1. obfuscating true research into these anomalous skulls
  2.  denying early oceanic crossings of humans & these kind of humans originating in Europe or Middle East around the Caspian and Black Seas..
  3. Ignoring these skulls by NOT subjecting them to rigorous & honest genetic DNA analysis..
  4. confusing the later ‘Indian’ Incas to these skulls via their bogus head binding theory.
  5. etc. etc.

I draw different conclusions than Foerster because we each come from totally different worldviews and scientific paradigms. I will explain:

Brian Foerster, — as many of his fellow travellers, like Matt Childress, Graham Hancock, and other “megalithomaniacs” – as they call themselves — are perhaps alternative in some ways, but still very mainstream in paradigm, in that they are still full-blown Darwinians, inspite of the facts and top scientists that have shredded this bogus theory as a total fantasy and untenable science. See our articles on the subject here on our site. Continue reading The Latest Elongated Skull Video & Our Different Conclusions than Brien Foerster

Wikipedia and Lucifer

By Kevin Boyle

Wikipedia calls Stephen Meyer and Michael Egnor “pseudo-scientists” because they both publicly support the idea of ‘intelligent design’.

‘RationalWiki’ goes further calling Egnor “a promotor of neuro-woo”. [RationalWiki has a “board” of directors who hide behind fake names]

Egnor and Meyer are modern “heretics” who speak out against the dominant establishment scientific doctrine, i.e. ‘materialism’, which asserts that:

Consciousness is an epiphenomenon of electro-chemical activity in the brains of sentient beings. Beyond these neural signals there is no consciousness. Whatsoever.

Thus the most mysterious phenomenon in the universe is reduced to being a by-product of sodium and potassium ions acting across cell membranes and there we have it; it is not consciousness that causes body chemistry, it is body chemistry that causes consciousness.

John Cleese quotes George Orwell regarding this issue when he says here that:

“Only an intellectual is capable of believing such nonsense.”

The question is … why does Wikipedia and every other establishment instrument in the public domain put so much effort into forbidding the idea that there is a ‘God’ that has created the universe?

The answers are fairly obvious but worth stating:

The establishment wants (and needs) us to listen to and obey its authority only.

The world is ruled by Luciferians who want and intend to displace God. They are, essentially, thieves who want to own it all and in order to achieve their goal they must persuade us to silence the voice of God, the Logos, within our very being. Along with everything else they decide what kind of drama we get to watch (e.g. anything on Netflix or, perhaps, predictably PC, arse-aching BBC sh*t like this)

God is love. The love of self and other. The affirmation of all.

Lucifer is love of self and rejection of all that does not serve love of self.

It begins with the illusion that self is source but even the self-love in Lucifer is God’s. Lucifer turns love against its true source. Free beings can do that. We are all capable of buying into the illusion (which is, literally nothing) to the point that we reject and act against the only thing that is real in us.

We, here on earth, need to recognise and know that which is believed by all in heaven.

That we are sources of nothing.

That all the good in us flows in from Heaven, and

All evil in us flows in from hell.

Why would people of faith pray (or agnostics desire the common good) if they did not know this already? The ‘Logos’ (the Divine within) is at work in us whether we are aware of it or not.

In the words of Emanuel Swedenborg, ‘Heaven and Hell’ §302

“I have talked with angels about the conjunction of heaven with the human race, and I said that, while the man of the Church declares that all good is from God, and that angels are with man, yet few believe that angels are conjoined to man, still less that they are in his thought and affection. To this the angels replied that they know that there is such a belief and even such a mode of speaking in the world, and especially, to their surprise, within the Church, where yet there is the Word to teach men about heaven and its conjunction with man.

Nevertheless, there IS such a conjunction that man is unable to think the least thing apart from the spirits adjoined to him, and on this his spiritual life depends. They said that the cause of ignorance of this matter is man’s belief that he lives from himself, without a connection with the Creator of life; and that he does not know that this connection exists by means of the heavens; and yet if that connection were broken man would instantly fall down dead.

If man believed, as is really true, that all good is from the Lord and all evil from hell, he would not make the good in him a matter of merit nor would evil be imputed to him; for he would then look to the Lord in all the good he thinks and does, and all the evil that inflows would be cast down to hell whence it comes. But because man does not believe that there is any influx into him either from heaven or from hell, and so supposes that all the things that he thinks and wills are in himself, and therefore from himself, he appropriates the evil to himself, and the inflowing good he defiles with merit.”

Michael Egnor: The Evidence against Materialism

Stephen Meyer: God and the Origin of the Universe

Tom Campbell: The Implications of Virtual Reality for Humanity

Source

The Manipulation of ‘Academic’ History – Written by the Winners!

Mr. D. Irving on British and German history during World War II, and how history is written by the ‘winners’. He describes how normy historians all quote each other and perpetuate their own hypothesis and lies! This is a very powerful expose of how universities and its established institutions are corrupting REAL history. Be sure to listen to this two hour presentation on World War II and Churchill as an ordinary war criminal. ‘ENJOY’ some true history. If you have trouble following the spoken English, turn on the CC button below the video. [WELL, Poutube censured & deleted the first one, as you can see, so I put an other one below, that’s been up for 4 years. let me know  when they take THAT one down.]

David Irving – Winston Churchill And His Secret Communications With President Roosevelt.

How Marxists & Identity Politics Hacks Hijack Faculty of Classical Studies

How I was Kicked Out of the Society for Classical Studies Annual Meeting

by Mary Frances Williams

by Desmond Berg Posted on March 12, 2019, 3:21 pm

I am a Classics Ph.D. who recently attended the 2019 Annual Meeting of the Society for Classical Studies (SCS—formerly the American Philological Association), a yearly conference that provides papers on classical subjects and interviews for academic positions. I now regret doing so since some remarks I made at the conference led to me being branded a “racist” and the loss of my editing job with the Association of Ancient Historians.I don’t usually attend because of the expense—I’m an independent scholar and cannot rely on universities for reimbursement. But it seemed like a good idea to go since the weather is always nice in San Diego. A bonus was the USS Midway, now a floating museum. The Midway, a World War II-era aircraft carrier that served as the command center for the bombing of Bagdad during the Gulf War, is well worth visiting. On January 5 I decided to attend panel #45, a “Sesquicentennial Workshop”—it was the 150th anniversary of the SCS—titled “The Future of Classics.” It was described in the meeting program as “an open and free-form large-room discussion of what we think the trajectories of our field, broadly defined, will and/or should be, not just in the immediate future but for the next 150 years.” Based on the description (“discussion” is mentioned three times), the panel seemed like an opportunity to raise some questions and obtain some answers about what was happening in the field.

Although I am a Classics Ph.D. and a former professor, it has been some time since I taught. But I have noticed a decline in the number of Classics courses being offered at universities, a shift in teaching focus, and, at least this past fall, a concentration on archaeology positions in the academic job market rather than for Classics generalists. I thought that I might contribute to the discussion, and that by asking questions I might learn what was going on and what others thought about the direction of the field. I knew nothing about the people who’d been invited to speak. Continue reading How Marxists & Identity Politics Hacks Hijack Faculty of Classical Studies

Ancient Pyramidal Egypt Had an Iron Culture Before the Darwinian “Bronze Age”

This video shows how 4500 years ago the pyramid builders had to have had machinery to cut basalt blocks and the Cairo museum of Antiquity shows pieces of iron cog wheels and iron saws. The periodisation of Stone, Bronze, and Iron Age is ideologically tainted by Darwinians to imply intellectual growth from Primates, to Cavemen, to Hunter Gatherers, to Early Man who was stupid and didn’t have iron and couldn’t get his act together, which is a totally false picture.

As the Darwinians could not fight this battle of wits any longer that there was iron machinery 4-5000 years ago, they changed tactics and infiltrated the Megalithic aficionados like Graham Hancock, making them talk about Man being here on Earth with smart civilisations long before 5000 years ago, like up to 10 or 20.000 years ago, again implying loooong ages and an oooold earth, which is not supported by the Ancients own writings, which you can find plenty of on this history blog.

ALL the ancients believed in a recent global flood and in Creation by God or gods before he Flood and in the Ten Kings that lived before the Flood. Oh the humanity! Why are we are so naive and so easily deceived by the elitist control freaks, also in academia? – Falsely so-called! Enjoy the video, and be educated.

History is Written by the Winners! [Also Ancient History by the same control freaks]

Although this video is about World War I  history, yet the question is raised in general, “Who teaches the teachers who teach the students?” And “who chooses the peers of the peer review system? And “who chooses the professors who teach the teachers?” And what influence do the foundations and sponsors of universities have on the academic standards of truth? And who do they represent? Corbett brings out the main culprit of history falsification, Cecil Rhodes of the “Rogue Scholars”, ahem.. I mean, Rhodes Scholars of the Round Table secret society that has ruled England for a century. England has also been the center of spreading the false science of Darwinism into the rest of the world. And that dear Ladies & Gentlemen, has screwed up ANCIENT History BIG time! (See our other articles) MUST WATCH!

Continue reading History is Written by the Winners! [Also Ancient History by the same control freaks]

Universities Have Become Globalists Propaganda Organizations

Via Paul Craig Roberts.org – Dec 10, 2018

Universities as massive Western, globalist propaganda tools

Hanne Herland — hannenabintuherland.com Dec 5, 2018

Historian and philosopher of science Thomas S. Kuhn garnered attention in the 1960s when he showed how subjective much of the research at universities really is. The dominant worldview strongly influences the opinions of professors and students alike.

The individual scientist is often much more influenced by the ideologies of his time and subjected to a peer pressure to reach the conclusions he knows will be applauded. He tends to end up interpreting his subject matter in line with the trends.

In “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,” Kuhn explains that in science, the dominant understanding of reality builds on a series of assumptions. It becomes the intellectual’s role to produce evidence that supports the dominant academic consensus, which Kuhn calls the dominant paradigm. [AP editor: Darwinian materialism!] Continue reading Universities Have Become Globalists Propaganda Organizations

Scientists Baffled by New Discoveries! Darwinian Evolution Fairytale! Scientists Abandon Theory

Lawrence Krauss — an unpleasant smarmy individual – who claims to be a scientist, rejects empirical scientific facts because he is stuck in an atheist Marxist narrative and mindset that refuses to listen or debate solid proofs and findings. He is like an academic Antifa, an Antiacadem, so to speak. Or you can call him an Antiscienc. Antiscienca don’t do science. They intimidate, verbally bully, & use straw-man slogans like “creationism” to throw debates off course. No fairness, no listening, no consideration of pertinent facts, not even cordial politeness to not interrupt or monopolise a conversation. He “owns the truth.” Yeah right. MUST WATCH!

 

Professor J. Wells Molecular & Cell Biologist Exposes Impossibilities of Evolution

Moths changing colors, Finches beaks, and other Darwinian Icons of “Evolution” are just not so, according to Professor Jonathan Wells PhD,  Molecular & Cell Biologist. But if you think that this research and true science will ever reach the public or change Quackademia’s mind and its controlled Education system, you are not aware of the agenda of the PTSB, the ‘powers that shouldn’t be’. MUST WATCH.

Yet “historians’ like Robert Sepehr and Graham Hancock and their many “alternative” cronies, the so-called “megalithomaniacs”, base their long ancient datings of 10.000 – 100.000 years BP of “human development” on its faulty non existing premises. Continue reading Professor J. Wells Molecular & Cell Biologist Exposes Impossibilities of Evolution

Darwin’s Vigilantes, Richard Sternberg, and Conventional Pseudoscience

Fred Reed — The Unz Review Sept 22, 2018

 I am sorry. I admit it: I am a bad person. I promise I will never write about this again. Well, sort of never. It’s just too much fun. Anyway, it’s not my fault. My childhood makes me do it. Maybe I ate lead paint.
Science is supposed to be objective study of nature, impelled by a willingness to follow the evidence impartially wherever it leads. For the most part it works this way. In the case of emotionally charged topics, it does not. For example, racial intelligence, cognitive differences between the sexes, and weaknesses in Darwinian evolution. Scientists who do perfectly good research in these fields, but arrive at forbidden conclusions, will be hounded out of their fields, fired from academic and research positions, blackballed from employment, and have their careers destroyed.
sternbergA prime example is Richard Sternberg, a Ph.D. in biology (Molecular Evolution) from Florida International University and a Ph.D. in Systems Science (Theoretical Biology) from Binghamton University. He is not a lightweight. From 2001-2007 he was staff scientist at the National Center for Biotechnology Information; 2001-2007 a Research Associate at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History.

Continue reading Darwin’s Vigilantes, Richard Sternberg, and Conventional Pseudoscience