By Lu Paradise — 224 total views –January 24, 2011
De meest verduisterde foto in de geschiedenis? [Translated from English and here in Spanish]
Er bestaat een zeer oude foto die niemand kan zien! Niet dat hij niet bestaat! Hij bestaat wel degelijk. Maar niemand mag hem echt zien van de “Gedachte Politie”. (1984 George Orwell) Zelfs wanneer mensen hem zien, kunnen velen hem nog niet echt zien zoals hij is! Tenminste heel weinigen onder hen. Ik hoop dat u het kunt! Sta mij toe om het tafereel te schetsen…
Wanneer een octopus bedreigd wordt, spuwt hij een verwarrende wolk inkt in het gezicht van zijn achtervolger. De inktvis is er nog wel, maar wordt onzichtbaar achter een wolk van inkt terwijl hij zijn ontsnapping maakt.James File wijst naar zijn slaap waar hij Kennedy doodschoot
Yet another sunken settlement, one in a rising number, was found below sea level again, this time off the coast of Southern Sweden. And once again it was mis-diagnosed, this time by the geological department of the Lund University with two handicaps. One, died-in-the-wool Darwinian geologists, and two, IF historians, they were obviously mainstream ones, as usual obfuscating the 1500 BC Bronze Age global Sea level rise! “Science Daily” followed right along in faux pas, doing its assigned media job to pound the paradigm into the minds of the mold-able masses.
A non-religious, rational, logical, point-by-point explanation why Earth could ONLY have suffered one huge water-driven Flood catastrophe in fairly recent ancient history. Proof that Neo- Darwinism is pseudo-science to destroy & obfuscate our true ancient history & heritage! — A MUST READ!
Evolutionary ‘science’ alleges the earth is about 4.6 billion years old and life started 3.8 billion years ago on the planet. It also alleges that life evolved from a single-celled ‘last common ancestor’ to all the diversity of life we see today. According to their story, the dinosaurs lived some 230 million years ago and died out about 63 million years ago.
The claim is that the fossil evidence supports this evolutionary story, whereas the Bible tells a completely different story. Most of the fossils are then the result of sudden burial in all the sedimentary layers laid down by global flood waters about 4,500 years ago. Dr Jim Mason presents some compelling arguments to answer the title question. He looks at the so-called geological column, where the flood fits into that, evidence on the age of fossils, uniformitarian principles, sediments and varves, soft tissue, blood cells, and DNA in dinosaur bones, homology and transitional forms.
This first video embodies the offical theory by Prof. Mark Lehner (and Egyptian Prof Hass his confrere) the ones who make sure that it stays in place and other theories do not threaten official book sales and paradigms.
Enjoy a scientific explantion of Dr. Walt Brown’s “Hydroplate theory” and Model, by Bryan Nickel. This theory to us seems superior to John Baumgardner, Catastrophic plate tectonics: the geophysical context of the Genesis Flood. Video Below Nickel’s.
John Baumgardner, Catastrophic plate tectonics:
Russia Today — feigning to “Question More”– fails to question Darwinian American Quackademia, trusting faulty C14 dating and non empirical conclusions that Indonesian dwarfs are a new “Hobbit”species and dating them to 700.000 years old. African Pygmies are not a new species because they are still alive, but the “hobbits”are dead, so they can be? Check here the reliability of Carbon Dating first.
This “research”is NO “BREAKTHROUGH”, just theoretical wishful thinking! This is merely a normal example of natural selection where some small people married and had small children, just like the Chihuahua is not a new species but is still a dog! It just can’t f**k a Great Dane anymore because of its size! DON’T BE BAMBOOZLED! You are being conditioned! See here: Radiometric dating can not even go beyond 250.000 years, because there is no more C14 left after that long. Continue reading RT Parrots New “Hobbit Species” Unscientific Darwinian Mythology→
by Jonathan Gray • March 9, 2014 • 0 Comments — 29 views
“Radiometric dating?” snorted Ray. “It’s useless in dating the past!” “What do you mean… useless?” I asked. “Look,” said Ray. “I’ll give you an example. Human remains found deep in the delta deposit near New Orleans, Louisiana, were dated at 57,000 years – but when wood from the gunwhale of a Kentucky flatboat was found deeper, the 57,000 years shrank to 200 or less. “You’re kidding!” I exclaimed. “No, that was true. And do you know, C-14 dating of Egyptian pharaohs’ tombs have registered mummies 500 years ‘older’ than their sarcophagi! And grains older than the containers in which they were found.”
A field archaeologist must not take anything for granted. This was something I had to check out. During many years of living in Australia, I made several visits to the island state of Tasmania. I know of a farmer near the town of Burnie who was removing some fence posts on his property. These had been set in the ground less than 100 years earlier. He discovered that the in-ground portion of each post had actually opalised. [PP: Converted into a substance resembling opal ; converted into opal by the … Hence “opalised wood,” or wood petrified by silica] Continue reading WHY AREN’T WE TOLD? Radiometric dating problems→
Characters, Origins, Identities, Exploits & Legends of Early Patriarchs on Post Flood Earth! GOING WHERE THE EVIDENCE LEADS US!