Category Archives: The Flood

Does Recently (2012) Declassified Data Falsify Plate Tectonics?

FOR USE ONLY WITH FEATURE STORY, NOT FOR COMMERCIAL STOCK Bathymetric model of the North Atlantic. 3-D satellite and bathymetry model showing the topography of the Earth’s crust over the North Atlantic. Iceland (centre) sits on a central-oceanic ridge that is extremely volcanically active. Lava pushing up beneath this ridge forces the North American plate (left) and the Eurasian plate (lower right) apart. This process is known as plate tectonics. This image was created by the German Aerospace Center (DLR) using measurments from the ERS-1 satellite.

AP EDITOR INTRODUCTION: In the past ‘Continental Drift’ was not popular and considered a fairy tale. But then it was recently proven that indeed the continents had drifted away from each other. Therefore the ‘scientists’ were hard up to find a scientific solution to this phenomenon. And so they came up with “Plate tectonics” as a recent initial ‘explanation’ to the enigma of the continents looking like they fit together. Plate tectonics has certain components that are based on guesswork, like subduction for example. The “subduction” theory surmised that the continental plates would slip under other plates and bend downward and melt in the magma under the plates, where as at other places the plates would come and be formed from under other plates. Then comes along Dr. Smoot who mapped the earth’s entire ocean floor over 35 years and discovered that subduction does not happen at all, and the theory is bogus. WHY do Darwinian scientists hold on to the theory? Because the only other theory that is observed and does make sense is the so-called ‘Hydroplate Theory’ of Dr. Walt Brown, but blasted, “Brown is a creationist.” Voila! That’s why they hold on to a disproven theory. Enjoy Dr. Walt Brown’s And Smoot’s explanation:

By Dr. Walt Brown

Ocean floors constitute 70% of earth’s solid surface. They were largely unexplored between 1957 and 1970, when the plate tectonic (PT) theory was developed. It was frequently said that we knew more about Mars than about the ocean floor. As a result, the PT theory, which primarily attempts to explain features on the ocean floor, was developed in the blind, without the data needed to formulate it or test it. Why then was plate tectonics accepted with enthusiasm?

A Brewing Crisis. Before PT, the only theory that tried to explain earth’s major surface features was the 1912 continental drift theory. It claimed, as its name implies, that the amazing and obvious jig-saw fit of the east coast of the Americas with the west coast of Europe and Africa is because the continents drifted apart. No one knew why a supercontinent broke apart or how the pieces could move. Did thousands of miles of solid rock plow through thousands of miles of solid rock? Why couldn’t the earth-science experts explain the fit that the public could plainly see? (You who have read pages 110434, now understand all that—and much more.) Continue reading Does Recently (2012) Declassified Data Falsify Plate Tectonics?

Tomb of Gilgamesh Found in Uruk! By Wikipedia Damned Euhemerism Vindicated Again!

Wow! This was big news! Shocking! Gilgamesh turns out to be more than fiction or myth, contrary to what academia has been pushing for a century. Gilgamesh was a real person and they found his tomb, just as it was said in the epic, built under the course of the Euphrates River! It only got a little mention in the BBC (in One Minute World News) where Uruk – the origin of eponymous Iraq!

NOTE how the BBC says “believed found!” If it was “Lucy’s” bones found over a couple square kilometers, they’d say, “definite proof of humanoid primate!” See, it all depends on what they want you to believe.

In this case the find of Gilgamesh tomb ought to be called the find of the decade or of the 21st century, as yet another ancient literary source (2300 BC) turns out to be historical and less “mythological” than widely assumed. Uruk was the first city? Responsible for most first inventions, like writing, law, education, taxes, love songs, ethics, justice, agriculture, medicine, love and family? Wow, that early?

But inspite of all these proven first inventions, mainstream historians don’t trust Sumer’s own historical writings and denounce them as fictitious mythology without any core of truth. After all they were the immdiate descendents of stupid cavemen and hunter gatherers! And Euhemerism is ‘a bad bad method of doing history!’ For sure!!

Continue reading Tomb of Gilgamesh Found in Uruk! By Wikipedia Damned Euhemerism Vindicated Again!

Flavius Josephus on Adam, the 10 Kings, Noah, the Flood, Earth’s Repopulation, & Tower of Babel



1. ADAM and Eve had two sons: the elder of them was named Cain; which name, when it is interpreted, signifies a possession: the younger was Abel, which signifies sorrow. They had also daughters. Now the two brethren were pleased with different courses of life: for Abel, the younger, was a lover of righteousness; and believing that God was present at all his actions, he excelled in virtue; and his employment was that of a shepherd. But Cain was not only very wicked in other respects, but was wholly intent upon getting; and he first contrived to plough the ground. He slew his brother on the occasion following : – They had resolved to sacrifice to God. Now Cain brought the fruits of the earth, and of his husbandry; but Abel brought milk, and the first-fruits of his flocks: but God was more delighted with the latter oblation, (6) when he was honored with what grew naturally of its own accord, than he was with what was the invention of a covetous man, and gotten by forcing the ground; whence it was that Cain was very angry that Abel was preferred by God before him; and he slew his brother, and hid his dead body, thinking to escape discovery. But God, knowing what had been done, came to Cain, and asked him what was become of his brother, because he had not seen him of many days; whereas he used to observe them conversing together at other times. But Cain was in doubt with himself, and knew not what answer to give to God. At first he said that he was himself at a loss about his brother’s disappearing; but when he was provoked by God, who pressed him vehemently, as resolving to know what the matter was, he replied, he was not his brother’s guardian or keeper, nor was he an observer of what he did. But, in return, God convicted Cain, as having been the murderer of his brother; and said, “I wonder at thee, that thou knowest not what is become of a man whom thou thyself hast destroyed.” God therefore did not inflict the punishment [of death] upon him, on account of his offering sacrifice, and thereby making supplication to him not to be extreme in his wrath to him; but he made him accursed, and threatened his posterity in the seventh generation. He also cast him, together with his wife, out of that land. And when he was afraid that in wandering about he should fall among Wild beasts, and by that means perish, God bid him not to entertain such a melancholy suspicion, and to go over all the earth without fear of what mischief he might suffer from wild beasts; and setting a mark upon him, that he might be known, he commanded him to depart. Continue reading Flavius Josephus on Adam, the 10 Kings, Noah, the Flood, Earth’s Repopulation, & Tower of Babel

The Role of Bias in the Origins Debate – Video by Brian Forbes + Powerpoint

By Brian Forbes

I aim to show that any evidence presented to us will invariably take a back seat to the fertility of the soil in our hearts. It is our bias that determines what we are able to see and accept for evidence.

Bias defined:  An emotional inclination to a particular view. Bias will often influence how you accept or reject evidence. Any position that has allowed for human evaluation will include bias. The question is not if there is bias. The question is what does your bias support. …and I can prove it.

Science is supposed to be based in objectivity – raw facts that lead to unemotional conclusions. The scientific method can be traced through:

  • René Descartes – who rid his mind of all bias
  • Francis Bacon – who described science in terms of cause and effect (experiments)
  • Karl Popper – falsifiability

They defined how we can know things without appealing to feeling. They set limits for “science” or knowledge. If it ain’t falsifiable,
it ain’t science. WATCH! Continue reading The Role of Bias in the Origins Debate – Video by Brian Forbes + Powerpoint

“The Eight” Flood Survivors in Global Deluge Legends A Shared Human Memory

A big percentage of the – by now – over 700 global Flood legends, mentioned exactly eight people who were spared and survived. It is uncanny that this number is handed down as fact so uniformly, instead of ten or five or some other random number.

EGYPT: In ancient Egypt, one Flood hero was Toth who survived the Deluge along with his Seven Sages.
The Egyptian ‘Ogdoad (is that where the Latin word for 8 ‘octo’ comes from?) were a group of eight survivors led by the main character Nun and his wife Naunet. Nun (Noah) is pictured in Egyptian art as upholding his boat with the seven other survivors here:

Continue reading “The Eight” Flood Survivors in Global Deluge Legends A Shared Human Memory


By Robert Bowie jr.

I had the good fortune of coming across the book, The Stars: A New Way to See Them by H. A. Rey some time ago. Rey’s book helped me understand the relationship between the earth’s daily rotation, its yearly revolution around the sun, and the place and appearance of the constellations. When I share my knowledge of the night sky with others, I begin by asking if anyone in the group can find the North Star because it is our frame of reference for what appears elsewhere. Almost invariably, someone in the group says, “The North Star is the brightest star, right?” Polaris is certainly visible to the naked eye, but as a second magnitude star in Ursa Minor, it is very far from the brightest, the Dog Star Sirius. There is no logical reason to assume that the earth’s axis conveniently points to the brightest star, yet people make that unwarranted assumption quite often.

        A similar illogical and unwarranted assumption prevails relating to the landing spot of Noah’s ark. People—highly educated people—are sure that Noah’s ark landed on the remote and inaccessible heights of Mount Ararat, a 17,000-foot volcanic mountain in modern-day Turkey. The Book of Genesis does not say that the ark landed near the top of Ararat, or even on Ararat, but rather “on the mountains of Ararat” (Genesis 8:4).

Continue reading WHERE NOAH’S ARK LANDED

Did You Ever Hear @ the Nuraghe Giants of Sardinia? Of course not! You were not supposed to know!

I am really into forbidden archaeology, historical cover-ups like Atlantis, The Flood, the recent Ice Age, Creation believed on by most of the ancients, exposing the over-promotion of the Darwinian NON theory, the 65 million extinction lie of the Dinosaurs, the suppression of pre Columbian cross oceanic travel, the earliest discovery of America by the Chinese, the academic ignoring of the megalithic over the non existent paleo- and neolithic, promotion of cavemen over smarter, stronger, and longer living early post Flood humans, etc and the true existence of suppressed giants!

I had heard about lots of discoveries of real giants, all over the world, and their suppression by academia and the Smithsonian Institute, but up until 2 weeks ago, I had never heard of an actual country and civilisation of giants in the middle of Europe, who left behind giant forts, towers,graves, and more. I just learned about the Nuraghi/Nuraghe of Sardegna, the island below Corsica next to Italy! See the multiple locations on the Sardinian map! Astounding! And it was all suppressed by the Powers That (shouldn’t) Be! the mainstream historians of course obfuscate them as Stone Age people. Aw…such poor puppies, these propagandised historians.

I don’t know much about them yet, other than that the local Sardegnians knew about these giants all along, held coming-of-age ceremonies for heir young men inside the scary precincts of these dead giants’ structures, and also knew that their local government and officials downplayed the giant aspect of them who are probably officially sworn to secrecy about them by the Darwinian regime, not being allowed to spread that news. Continue reading Did You Ever Hear @ the Nuraghe Giants of Sardinia? Of course not! You were not supposed to know!

Kensington Rune Stone Cryptography- More ‘Academia’ Suppressed Proof of Pre-Columbian Travel to America

Why is Academia – some call it quackademia! – fighting pre-Columbian cross Atlantic travel from the Old World, like the dickens? This kensington Rune Stone was actually from 1362 AD, only 130 years before Christopher Columbus. What is all the fuzz  about a mere 130 years before Columbus? A mere second in eternity?

What is their beef? Are they Portuguese nationalists who prefer the discovery of the Western continents by one of their own? Or are they so in love with Columbus that any other person or entity before him  just doesn’t cut the cake to be the “discoverer?” No! Nothing to do with their real motivation.

For now  let me tell you why! Academia just does NOT ALLOW PRE-Columbian Cross Atlantic travel for pure ideological or religious reasons. We’ll explain more about that later, but first watch this interesting short video about how the stone was found and proven authentic by geologic research and cross-cultural research in Gotha Sweden that used the exact same rune script. Yet the owners of the “higher halls of learning” has coined it a hoax, simply because “it was just too early!”VIDEO MUST WATCH
Continue reading Kensington Rune Stone Cryptography- More ‘Academia’ Suppressed Proof of Pre-Columbian Travel to America

“Humans Created Sahara Desert?” Not so! Cooler Ocean Climate Change Did It! MS Media Non-“Science”

Most true historians were beginning to KNOW that the Bronze Age Collapse around 1200 BC was caused by Climate Change, when the big rains began to stay away for good, which dried the Sahara & Sahel into desert, and the cattle grazing peoples and their cattle had to move away.

It wasn’t just the Sahara either. Vast swats of land over the entire Middle East, Mesopotamia, Persia, Afghanistan, the Indus Valley, Turkmenistan, Mexico, and many other parts of the earth. (See our animated world-map gif below.)

Dear archaeologists and David Wright from Seoul University, you are not right. I’m sorry to tell you, but your conclusions are wrong, and many of your peers know it.

Check the research by Sapienza University about the desiccation of the Sahara which they proved to be cattle grazing land, plus with a much better dating from 5000 to 3500 years ago – the last date corresponding with our researched estimates. (see graphics below) Continue reading “Humans Created Sahara Desert?” Not so! Cooler Ocean Climate Change Did It! MS Media Non-“Science”

Was Ron Wyatt God’s Archaeologist?

ron_wyattAll through out history there have been these “blood feuds” over God’s people. Even Jesus Himself was no stranger to controversy, and you wonder how many Christians today would have been on the Pharisees’ side condemning Him for “breaking the law” and “being a friend of sinners” and “lo, he deceives the people”, and “are ye also deceived?”

Most of these Christians who are like that, — and we wouldn’t want to mention any names, now would we?– would never even realise that they would have been on the wrong side. They think that since they are ”Christians” they have “discernment”, even to tell right from wrong, much like many other Muggles of today can tell “Right from Left”, yet don’t realise they are all caught up in a bankers’ created paradigm meant to divide and conquer them, so they can rule over them. Meaning, NO discernment whatsoever!

Many times, what Christians call “discernment” is nothing else but a severe case of a critical spirit! Judgmental, stuck on themselves, conservative, reactionary, old bottles, who say, “Yeah the new wine may be what you like, but we prefer the old wine!”

Was Ron Wyatt God’s archaeologist? Well, if you listen to James Randi and Michael Shermer the famous Skeptics, of course he wasn’t! Considering the source that should be encouraging to Ron’s surviving relatives, who very much believe in their father and husband. Ron doesn’t need the encouragement anymore, he was received into Heaven with flying colors. What do I mean? Continue reading Was Ron Wyatt God’s Archaeologist?