Via 21st Century Wire – August 4, 2019
Was Darwin wrong? Bring this question up in mainstream academia and you’re likely to be attacked by colleague and media operatives alike, if not run-out of any institution you’re working at.
According to some, the ‘glory days’ of science are over. In The End of Science, author John Horgan contends that, “Science will keep extending and tweaking its current paradigms, like evolution by natural selection and the big bang, but there won’t be any more comparably profound ‘revelations or revolutions.’”
Others are taking this inquiry a bit further, and actually dismantling the highest sacred cows of science, including the seemingly untouchable: Darwin’s theory of evolution. They are asking a fundamental question: since new evidence and knowledge that functioning proteins are extremely rare, then maybe Darwin should be replaced with a theory of intelligent design? If so, then the following two questions are essential:
- Has modern science developed institutionalized dogmatic belief structures that are similar to that of the church?
- Has Darwinism really failed?
Probing for answers… Continue reading Leading Yale Professor Pushes Back Against Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
by Dr Jerry Bergman
The latest study published in the journal titled American Scientist is an article titled “Reexamining Lyell’s Laws” by New York Professor Michael Rampino. The article opines that “Increasing evidence points to the role of periodic catastrophes in the shaping [of] Earth’s history, challenging long-standing dogma within geology.”[i] The long-standing dogma is uniformitarianism, the idea that changes in the earth during geological history have resulted primarily from the action of slow, continuous and uniform processes. Furthermore, present geological changes have been considered the key to past geological changes. This perception contrasts with the theory that changes in the earth’s crust during geological history have resulted chiefly from rapid, violent and non-uniform events, such as floods.
In short, the two views would explain the formation of the Grand Canyon by a little water over a very long period of time (uniformitarianism) or a lot of water in a short period of time (catastrophism). Darwin relied heavily on uniformitarianism in developing his theory of evolution because he realized for it to be viable requires an enormous amount of time to evolve life from simple organisms, such as bacteria, to complex organisms, such as humans. Continue reading Lyell’s Slow-and-Gradual Geology Is No Longer Tenable
January 13, 2013 |Lu Paradise — 185 total views
Global Repopulation – by J.Nienhuis
Exposition One: As the ice age snowpacks were building in the aftermath of Noah’s Flood and after the Tower of Babel confusion of the languages (probably from Hebrew), about five hundred miles southeast from the landing place of Noah’s Ark in eastern Turkey, the clans listed in Genesis 10 began to spread out across the globe, many by sea, for instance offspring of Canaan, his son Sidon among them, known to many as the sea god Posidon, who with his son Atlas sailed west to the Sierra Morena mountains of southern Spain, the richest mining district in the ancient world, the lifeblood for the great wealth of the Atlantean empire.
The remnant of that empire was later known at the time of the book of Judges circa 1300 B.C. as Tarshish, with the legendary “Ships of Tarshish,” he who had been a son of Javan, the Greek Iawan having been name-sake of the Ionians, Javan who was a son of Japheth, the “mythological” god Jupiter. [India: Yapeti!] Continue reading Post-Deluge Earth’s Global Re-Population Record Re-Evaluated & Vindicated
by Lu Paradise • February 9, 2014 • 9 Comments — 79 views
Chapter 2 – ’6000 Years of History’ by Dr. Herman L. Hoeh
How long has Man been upon earth? Where, and through whom, did civilization originate? What about “prehistoric man”? Can the history of the Bible be reconciled with ancient history? with Egyptian and Babylonian chronology?
Historians and archaeologists are sharply divided over these questions today. Many sense something is drastically wrong with the present explanation of the ancient world. How did all this scholarly doubt arise?
It is Never Safe to Assume
Remove from a library shelf any volume on world history or ancient man and examine its opening chapters. In it will be such expressions as: “it is thought,” “there appears to be some basis for believing,” “it has been suggested,” “it may be presumed,” “one may safely assume,” and “others are of the opinion” — just to mention a few. Continue reading Compendium of World History Volume 1 No Such Thing As “Prehistory” of Man!
by Lu Paradise • May 28, 2013 — 192 views
Mainstream history academia has been hijacked and handicapped by false paradigms which morphed it into an unscientific mess of confusion on key issues like chronology, ancient history, megaliths, ice ages, dating, origins of civilizations, intercontinental traffic and contacts, origin of man, and more.
In the past things had been more or less under control in historical science. It had pretty much all been settled, for example that, “there had been “no pre- Columbian contacts between the Old World and the New World until the Indians had crossed via the Behring Street” or “the Vikings came via Iceland“, which fits the Darwinian paradigm much better than ancient sea-faring savants in ships crossing all the oceans long before Columbus!
Darwinist-style history used to be long established, poured, and cemented into most minds of the world’s masses, hammered in via its key-concepts like “Cambrian, Holocene, Pleistocene, Pre-history, Paleolithic, Neolithic, cavemen, Neanderthalers, Hunter-Gatherers”, etc., via the glossy pages of the complicit mainstream media! Continue reading Blind orthodox historians & “alternative” gatekeepers refuse to see the huge mammoth in the historical livingroom!
by Lu Paradise • May 18, 2014 • 0 Comments — 44 views
PP Editor: This research CONFIRMED by Hydraulics Dept Colorado State University’s experiment, confirms our article on geological strata: ‘Where did all that rock come from?’
Analysis of Main Principles of Stratigraphy on Basis of Experimental Data Disproves Long Geological Time-Scale
Photo: Guy Berthault, the author is a graduate of The Ecole Polytechnique, France, and a member of the International Association of Sedimentologists and lives in Paris, France.
Article: Analysis of the Main Principles of Stratigraphy on the Basis of Experimental Data A New Approach : Paleohydraulic Analysis by Guy Berthault.
“When I started my experiments on strata formation I was surprised to find how little work had been done on the subject in the past. Of course, sediments had been examined and flume experiments performed in connection with building and other projects, but none with the object of explaining the mechanics of stratification.”
Continue reading Geological Time-Scale Empirically Proven Way Too Old! Stratigraphy Paper Falsifies Theory!
Even though we are not creationists, this video present another theory than the Darwinian Macro Evolutionism or morphology, without quoting Bible verses. Enjoy.
This is part one of The Genesis Theory. Part one focuses on presenting relevant information needed to understand the theory. In this video, you will be exposed to many different lesser-known scientific theories. Part two will focus on the actual theory and will reference this video several times, in addition to introducing new concepts.
The Genesis Theory is a new theory to explain the origins of the universe and our place in it, in relation to the Scriptures.
By Michael Snyder
The theory of evolution is false. It is simply not true. Actually, it is just a fairy tale for adults based on ancient pagan religious philosophy that hundreds of millions of people around the world choose to believe with blind faith. When asked to produce evidence for the theory of evolution, most adults in the western world come up totally blank. When pressed, most people will mumble something about how “most scientists believe it” and how that is good enough for them. This kind of anti-intellectualism even runs rampant on our college campuses. If you doubt this, just go to a college campus some time and start asking students why they believe in evolution. Very few of them will actually be able to give you any real reasons why they believe it. Most of them just have blind faith in the priest class in our society (“the scientists”).
But is what our priest class telling us actually true? When Charles Darwin popularized the theory of evolution, he didn’t actually have any evidence that it was true. And since then the missing evidence has still not materialized. Most Americans would be absolutely shocked to learn that most of what is taught as “truth” about evolution is actually the product of the overactive imaginations of members of the scientific community. They so badly want to believe that it is true that they will go to extraordinary lengths to defend their fairy tale. They keep insisting that the theory of evolution has been “proven” and that it is beyond debate. Meanwhile, most average people are intimidated into accepting the “truth” about evolution because they don’t want to appear to be “stupid” to everyone else. Continue reading 44 Reasons Why Evolution Is Just A Fairy Tale For Adults