“Scientists believe!” What do they believe? That it “could be!” Could be what? “3.77 billion years old!” Not 3.76, nor 3.78, mind you. No! 3.77 billion! That is 3.770.000.000 years ago! An awful long time ago when there were no witnesses around to verify their hypothesis.
And what is their “science” based on? Oh, on “the geologic time scale” that is based on “key fossils“, which are dated by the layers they are found in, and the layers in turn are dated by the key fossils that are found in them. Very nifty circular reasoning. But to these “scientists” that doesn’t matter, because their hypothesis is supported by International Academe who has long rubber-stamped Darwinian theory to virtually be a “law of nature” because “there is no more debate” on their “science by consensus” and support of MS Media. Continue reading Nature “Scientists believe rock fossils could be 3.77 billion years old.” (Not 3.78 mind you!)
Surely Charles Darwin, if he had encountered this amazing strange sea creature during his trip to South America to find the finches evolving, would have classed this in the “Tree of Life” as related to the grass mower or the vacuum cleaner, except that it doesn’t use electricity.
Well, the Darwinists are going to have a very hard time to find missing links in the geological timeline and column! because this creature has no bones. So it is a NON vertebrae! Ha! What a crock of feces the theory is.
ANOTHER STRANGE CREATURE THAT DOES NOT FIT IN THE “TREE OF LIFE”
TO CONFUSE THOSE DARWINIANS EVEN MORE.. BALI HOSTS MORE MYSTERIOUS CREATURES WITHOUT ANY FOREFATHERS OR FOREMOTHERS ON THE NOTORIOUSLY MISSING TREE OF LIFE LINKS. ENJOY THE DEATH OF A DEADLY FAILING THEORY THAT IS PRESCRIBED AS BRAIN FODDER FOR YOUR POOR TODDLERS, GRADE-SCHOOLERS, HIGH-SCHOOLERS, AND (COUGH COUGH..) UNIVERSITY STUDENTS – LIKE YOU ONCE WERE. (QU)ACADEMICS ARE WILLING STOOGES FOR REASONS OF FINANCIAL SURVIVAL. THEY KNOW WHERE THEIR BREAD IS BUTTERED, – ON THE SIDE OF SPINELESS COWARDICE – kind of like the sea pigs you just observed empirically. Ha!
(Worst thing is: They are not even intellectually offended by this quackery!)