King Arthur was British/ Welsh! History Systematically Suppressed Hijacked by UK Establishment & Academia!


Not only has Welsh (British) history BEFORE Caesar been covered up by London & (qu)academia, so has the fact that King Arthur came from S-E Wales! Richard Hall has extensively covered the work of Wilson and Blackett who found indisputable evidence of the resting place of King Arthur. In these MUST WATCH videos, he presents 5 more experts (one from Cardiff University), and all agree, King Arthur (King of Glamorgan!) was not from Badon, Castle Killibury, Glastonbury, South Cadbury, or Chester, but factually rests in Wales and lived in the 6th century. This fact is covered up to squelch Welsh identity & British nationalism! Why? Because Family, Nation, & Religion do not support the ‘New World Order’s’ designs for One World Government! Welsh history also happens to support Noah & the Flood, and thus Christianity, and therefore by definition also disqualifies and falsifies Darwinism! Forbidden history! It means that Welsh history is just as old as much touted 4-5000 year long Chinese History & culture! In fact almost every nation in this world has as long a history!  [Below: The Arthur Stone]


The original British people are not Anglo, Saxon, Roman, Norman, Viking, nor Celtic. The term Celtic was invented in 1714 to put a name to the groups of people whose true history they wanted to hide. A Kingdom existed in the British Isles long before any of these groups arrived and a long line of Kings has been traced by Wilson & Blackett.WHoFoundArthur





Arthur2Arthur and his predecessors represent the original British sovereign line. Because of this, the current monarchy (who are German) destroyed the teaching of Welsh history. This is why the establishment will not look at the findings in today’s show and why MI5 have helped to cover it up. Also REAL Welsh history traces down all the way to Noah!


This ancient British Alphabet below, was also falsely condemned as a forgery by Oxfordians! Falsification of REAL history! Damn FALSE ACADEMIA AND THEIR BOGUS SCIENCE BECAUSE OF POLITICS! BritishAlphabet


MAY THE WELSH PEOPLE WAKE UP TO THEIR OWN HERITAGE, and while you’re at it, DUMP THE TELEGRAPH FOR PRINTING ANGLO-SAXON, N.W.O HISTORICAL RUBBISH! THAT is if you like to be an INDEPENDENT THINKER instead of a mass media slave! And cut your BBC cable at the same time and protest against BBC TAX!




This is the incomplete faulty transcription of the first video above

I just made this today for those who came from facebook, who may not have no time to watch these very interesting videos! It is incomplete and faulty I know, ESPECIALLY lacking are these beautiful ‘Elfish’ sounding names and poems, but you’ll get the point.

Many councils around the country are slashing their budgets, due to the socalled recession
I prefer to call it a theft, but that is another subject
As part of cost saving
The island is currently part of St. Mary’s parish which is a church in Cardiff
but runs at a loss and its disposal would save the council
Why am I mentioning all this? I am mentioning this, because South Wales has assets
which its current leaders

One of these is the grave of the legendary King Arthur and lies in a ruined church on fortress mountain Bridge end
If this site
thousands of jobs and people would come from all corners of the globe
There would be no need to sell Flathome, but don’t take my word for it, but listen to the experts, in today’s program

I’m reporting today on a fresh new inside into historical research which places the legendary King Arthur in Wales.
I’ll be speaking to two researchers who have compiled researched          date and location of King Arthur the First and King Athur the Second
I’ve interviewed Alan Wilson and Barren blacket in the past, and covered some of their works tracing the kings arthurs.
Today I have returned specifically to document the evidence which proves the existence date and location of King Arthurs
We are also going to screen some suppporting testimonies of six wellknown professionals in this field.

Britain has some very strange problems in that .. we have a massive history, very well documented and recorded, and yet which is attacked, in other words, and generally regarded as a huge forgery.

The paradox with British history, is there seems to be a preconceived mindset within an inaccurate framework. In other words basically the correct synthesis, is not actual relevant which is accunulated

Particularly as it related to  sites which are traceable, battlefields which are traceable, buildings and ruins which are traceable

Misguided political reasons we offer the irst in Morkshire
So basically rather crippled situation people benefit from it

If we look at it, we’ve got one or two salient points that are being attacked.
One, we have an ancient British alphabet. Now this was wrongly attacked
as being forged and fabricated in 1800. So in 1776 he is recording an inscription on an ancient stone of a king who lived in
And yet this alphabet is not “forged” until 1800? So there is something wrong, so this set us off there is something seriously wrong here.
And then we searched and found all sorts of people have written
and produced documents.

Up until this day historical professioanls have not spoken at length about King Arthur being in Wales
Just tell us about the people in the program today.

The paradox at long last has emerged that over six experts probably three professors and other experts and historians of at least thirty years of standing, who actually agree emphatically that King Arthur the Second is from South Wales.

Then we found Julius Cesar has described the alphabet! Now hang on, this is getting a bit much.  So we realised that there was something very seriously wrong. So it was the discovery of this alleged “forged alphabet” which is NOT A FORGERY but really the “atom bomb of historishima.” It blew everything about !

Then we have got things like the ancient Bards of Britain, again, but in it, and this is an old book Same age as
There is one of 1906, there is one of 1848 here
This quoting ancient texts, this is 1848, and this guy again is AGAIN a scholar, quoting ancient records!
Now why they have got away with this allegation. It was only made around 1936!

These historical professionals sadly have come quite a bit late butchered it is self explanatory what they are saying really.

In the scintilar of history that remains to us, a name appeared, and that name was Arthur.
In the Nennius Bisilini, in the Ashvillan museum, there are many things said about this hero figure only one said this heroe figure was mentioned before
But that was unfortunate for everyone in Welsh.
In the peom the Godowin in which the beautiful sinister chilling phrase, “Gohorai braindi a weeir guire
“The ravens of the castle walls were glutted, but he was not Arthur”
This identifies the time, the place and the potential hero.

I am surprised that there isn’t a lot more support for developing the arturian legends in relation to Wales from the main guangle essentiually, because it really is in our interest to raise the profile, becasuse even if the geography is contracted, it is still related to
the Welsh nation and our heritage. I think it is the key Arthur is part of our hheritage

There is so mcuh evidence for placing him in South East Wales
that it reallty is amazing that this ideas has not been accepted!

Well, I have never had any doubts that Arthur is a Welshman
Nod doubts at all!
And his power base would be in Monmouth by the Severn there.
That’s where the legend grew and where it developed. And when we celebrate that fact certainly people form abroad. You have to mention the Glstonbury ,…. when they hijacked Wales
Once got
the Welsh people
And I think that it is very important in our time of history

I’ve been working in this part of the world, in tourism, for over twenty years, and when I first arrived, Arthur this is the big story here
arthur is the big story here
And I was surprised I suppose with all the claims
I thin k it is a combination of things. I guess a kind of organisational inertia, to some extent.
But everybody knew that Arthur came from S.E. Wales. there is no disputing as fas the folk memory is concerned.
But it was just one of theose things
and there are plenty of physical evidence of other things that weren’t exploited that time.
so i think it was probably a combination of events and I suppose to some extent, people felt, that maybe we missed the boat
“Winchester got the story, Glastonbury has got the story, and what can we add?”
Forgetting of course that this is where the original story really was!

We are not being allowed to conform to the normal standards applied to any other nation
in the presentation of our history
It is unreasonable to expect that everything our history should always be recorded in contemporaneous
There is enough contemporaneous record in the stones, that what the stones tell us
They’ve taken the stones, and thanks to a
misreading redating them by 5- 6000 years
And this application of a double standard that no British record can be believed, unless a Roman, or a Greek, wrote the same record, or somebody else wrote the same record, that is being applied.

And it’s clearly, it is what they are doing to us, is a mistrial. You’ll be arrested, given a fair trial, found guilty and shot!
It doesn’t matter what you got. we know that given these unfair rules,
no other history, you can’t win!

And there is a very good story out there which  hasn’t been told from the Welsh angle.
And I think if we could tell that story from a Welsh angle we’d have a lot of people now living in America, Australia, parts really of the old empire, and the Welsh diaspora, who’d be very interested in visiting Wales, perhaps coming over to Wales for different reasons, “well this will be a good opportrunity to visit Wales, to check out some of these very interesting Arthurian legends. And we need desperately tell those story

When you put him in the right time period and in the right location, the erea of his true realm, you really can get to grips with the problem. Now Arthur…

Characters of that period , they often had several names
Also bought the name “athmahl”
And what is really fascinating that the name Athmahl appears on two or three Dark Age inscribed stones which can be found in the vale of glomorgan!

He has been accepted in all sorts of cultures. He has been de-racinated, without roots, he has been de-nationalised, de-tribalised and he becomes a world icon, and people do with him what they wish!
German literature French literature, he appears in Spanish literature
Our Arthur becomes now the source by which the kings of England claim their right to rule.
But all the time if you read about him, in both the reality of the 6th and ninth century practically and you see him in the new fictitious romantic pre Hollywood, you give him what nationality you wish, and give him what accent you wish,…
But we the Welsh who created him have been denied him, by the fact that he is so valuable as an icon an attractive public figure, a figure for Touristic useage. And all I wish is that we claim him back and go back in the ancient history and identify him for what he is, according to the early latin literature of course, Geoffrey of Monmouth, who gave him the mark of the Arthur we know which is part of the romantic history of the world.

We find a very interesting reference of him in the roots of England. And remember, in modern times this would have been firmly believed as genuine history.
so in chapter 79 its telling how King Arthurs is off in France Brittany area   And its all about the Easter time, and it says, “And when King Arthur had thus his knights feasted, at April, after next sowing, he came again into Britain, his own land. And after at witsen tide, next sowing, by council of his bands, he would be crowned King of Glammorgan!”
So everybody in Britain, King Atrhur was certainly king of Glomorgan
There is no doubt about it

In South Wales we are really missing out on the tourism point of view
and planted in the West country
Because the story of Arthur really belongs to this area. It has been snatched, taken ….
Tincastle castle where the supposed grave of King Arthur was discovered in 1191
It really was a publicity stunt by the monks who were trying to raise money, who were trying to rebuilt their abbey
So we really want King Arthur in this area, to help our tourist industry

Priest: I would commission an Arthur window. Because we need that.
I was brought up in the fact that all these saints were the original knights of the Round Table! And when you read even the early
Monmouth that is part of WALES! So for me these were native princes. These are native princes
they are drawn together by this Arthur figure and they were educated
So, yes, we need places, not just churches, it is a big part of us,
We need to nourish our young people with this legend.
I look at it
We need to make that connection, because it is important

It doesn’t matter what was not written down.
You nedd somebody to promote it from the tip
 there is a lot of mystery
about the key Celtic key
We should get firmly behind it
If Scotland
as they have down with braveheart
They had some heroe
I’d like to see with the Arthurian legend
some of which that would have been by Atrhur
probablyy also as th one on the way in
That is a backdrop of some fantastic
young Welsh nation
What a time to reinvent this history
I think the assembly should get behind it
And I would take the stance
It would be more
based around King Arthur
The one thing
is a factional existence of a real building
rediscovered, archaeologically
before that time the depression in the ground was known as the round table
third or fourth century
entirely unique apart from the vast mass of anecdotal history
the Arthurian saga
12 century can not match
In South Wales for ex. the Tourist industry is very
10 million visitors
but if you think abo teach one of those spending over a hundred opunds
people come here for
and it wont more
Just think of a small increase
anything that can raise
if we spend huge amount of mnay
of course there are lots of lovely places
the heart of King Arthur’s cathedral, the arthurian legnd, this is really where the round table was
we could tell people where King Arthur and his knights roamed
A fantastic story
sands and mountain
he sleeps to rise again
I think nowis the time when he will rise again
tourism in Wales, sad to say, was based almost
bring ém in and
tourism was based on
as one could
come here on a holiday
that certainly is far more evisdnet now
where we now have our own parliament
Itsd actually something
King Arthurtime is come again
for 16 years now
total expert
from jerusalem,
33 AD
church of Rome acknowlegded this
bishop of Rome
other sources supported this
manuscripts in wales
virign Mary
Allabach, this leading Jew in Alexandria
so that set us up
but this idea of the decendenscy from the Holy Family
and they say
Amalech was the son of
Mary the virgin, the mother of jesus Christ
this would be
the most illustrious
anceint jkings you see
more rapid progression now
we must it is high time tha the 17th, and 19th
far behind, and we go on the evidence
In geneaology number two
son of arthur

The Welsh (British) survive, despite attempts to wipe out the people, history, culture and language; respectively by the Romans, Anglo-Saxons, Illuminati and English.

What evidence does the “synagogue of Satan” fail to hide? It’s in your face: “King David” (Saint David) is a “Khumry” name. Anything else? Was Coelbren found on Solomon’s Temple?

“The ancient Coelbren Alphabet is the language (original ancient script) of the Khumry, it is 4000 years old.”… .

Baram Blackett: “It is time … to leave the Victorian anachronisms far behind … and look at the evidence.”

Welsh haplogroups: “This type of genetic makeup (y-DNA type E1b, mt-DNA type J) is usually found in the Eastern Mediterranean.”

mt-DNA type J:…

mt-DNA type K:…

4 thoughts on “King Arthur was British/ Welsh! History Systematically Suppressed Hijacked by UK Establishment & Academia!”

  1. Hi this is a great read .
    I am part half welsh / british part irish part german lol born in england the same as the rest of my family .
    Now this is my first holiday to south wales and i can’t help but think how much the welsh have been mistreated by the english even though i consider myself to be english.
    I kind of Knew the welsh had a lot more history than my anglo saxon ancestors the very fact you speak welsh is a sign of being indigenous and true welsh british mainly have black hair suggests your of a totalLy different genetic background from uk and the fact you did already established your own lands and cultUre .

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I might add in these modern times the western race is under attack and although the welsh where here before us english i consider to be indigenous to the british isles .
    And yes the english would have taken a lot from the welsh and lied about it but as the iris welsh scots and english are all indigenous to the british isles we need to pull together against NWO and media lies like the bbc and cnn etc. i am worried for the future of us all welsh irish english scots and the western race as we know it due to the immigration policy and greedy politicians sell out pop stars are getting in the way of all british people.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.