Why is Academia – some call it quackademia! – fighting pre-Columbian cross Atlantic travel from the Old World, like the dickens? This kensington Rune Stone was actually from 1362 AD, only 130 years before Christopher Columbus. What is all the fuzz about a mere 130 years before Columbus? A mere second in eternity?
What is their beef? Are they Portuguese nationalists who prefer the discovery of the Western continents by one of their own? Or are they so in love with Columbus that any other person or entity before him just doesn’t cut the cake to be the “discoverer?” No! Nothing to do with their real motivation.
For now let me tell you why! Academia just does NOT ALLOW PRE-Columbian Cross Atlantic travel for pure ideological or religious reasons. We’ll explain more about that later, but first watch this interesting short video about how the stone was found and proven authentic by geologic research and cross-cultural research in Gotha Sweden that used the exact same rune script. Yet the owners of the “higher halls of learning” has coined it a hoax, simply because “it was just too early!”VIDEO MUST WATCH Continue reading Kensington Rune Stone Cryptography- More ‘Academia’ Suppressed Proof of Pre-Columbian Travel to America→
Most true historians were beginning to KNOW that the Bronze Age Collapse around 1200 BC was caused by Climate Change, when the big rains began to stay away for good, which dried the Sahara & Sahel into desert, and the cattle grazing peoples and their cattle had to move away.
It wasn’t just the Sahara either. Vast swats of land over the entire Middle East, Mesopotamia, Persia, Afghanistan, the Indus Valley, Turkmenistan, Mexico, and many other parts of the earth. (See our animated world-map gif below.)
Dear archaeologists and David Wright from Seoul University, you are not right. I’m sorry to tell you, but your conclusions are wrong, and many of your peers know it.
All through out history there have been these “blood feuds” over God’s people. Even Jesus Himself was no stranger to controversy, and you wonder how many Christians today would have been on the Pharisees’ side condemning Him for “breaking the law” and “being a friend of sinners” and “lo, he deceives the people”, and “are ye also deceived?”
Most of these Christians who are like that, — and we wouldn’t want to mention any names, now would we?– would never even realise that they would have been on the wrong side. They think that since they are ”Christians” they have “discernment”, even to tell right from wrong, much like many other Muggles of today can tell “Right from Left”, yet don’t realise they are all caught up in a bankers’ created paradigm meant to divide and conquer them, so they can rule over them. Meaning, NO discernment whatsoever!
Many times, what Christians call “discernment” is nothing else but a severe case of a critical spirit! Judgmental, stuck on themselves, conservative, reactionary, old bottles, who say, “Yeah the new wine may be what you like, but we prefer the old wine!”
Was Ron Wyatt God’s archaeologist? Well, if you listen to James Randi and Michael Shermer the famous Skeptics, of course he wasn’t! Considering the source that should be encouraging to Ron’s surviving relatives, who very much believe in their father and husband. Ron doesn’t need the encouragement anymore, he was received into Heaven with flying colors. What do I mean? Continue reading Was Ron Wyatt God’s Archaeologist?→
Dr. Richard Lumsden – professor of parasitology and cell biology at Tulane University in Louisiana. Served as Dean of the Graduate school of biological sciences. Published about 90 peer-reviewed papers and was awarded the Henry Baldwin Ward medal for his work in parasitology.
Stumbled onto a Darwinian ‘Creationist’ blog called ‘Naturalis Historia’, which means as much as Natural History, but I didn’t find it so natural, other than it being a Naturalistic Materialist Darwinian philosophy blog, under Christian Flag? I guess by the time you have written over a hundred articles defending Darwinism, it is awfully hard to have a metanoia, as Heinrich Heine, the great Skeptic, had, who at his end changed his attitude. In the postscript to his poem collection “Romancero” (30.9.1851) he wrote:
“When you are on your deathbed, you become more sensitive and you would like to make peace with God and the world. Poems, that only contained halfway reproaches against God, I delivered over to the flames in a fearful zeal. It is better, that the verses burn than the verse maker, I returned to God as a prodigal son, after I fed the swine with the Hegelians for a long time. In the theology I have to accuse myself of retreating, because I returned to a ‘personal God’.” As he died: “God will forgive me. It’s his job.” source
They seem to believe – I think – in the spurious, unproven, “millions of years” undocumented history and the widely accepted morphology from postulated “primates” into (squatting of course! Like monkeys, you see?) Photo-shopped Cavemen, then Hunter-gatherers, and Neanderthalers, into agricultural “Homo Sapiens”, and then finally “Homo Sapiens Sapiens” (Think twice!) paradigm.
Because they have such a hard time adopting a recent ancient history, limited by the global Flood around 2400 BC, the 10 Pre-Flood Kings, and the 8 Flood Survivors, whom all the Ancients talked about, incl. the Sumerians, Indians, Greeks, Egyptians, Chinese, and others, plus the now over 700 counted global Flood histories! That can hardly be called a fluke, can it now?
I think many academically trained Christians have a very hard time accepting the Patriarchs and their honest accounts, that Earth was recently created, not long before the Flood, because they all testified of it.
I guess it stems from shamed embarrassment and ridicule that they already had to endure for being Christians in skeptic leftist universities, and especially for confessing a recently created Earth. It is so hammered into them – and all of us! – that they feel like they just can’t make the break from the “millions and billions of years” postulated age of the Earth, afraid to be delegitimatised by their peers. Peer pressure is a real problem, especially in the modern mostly Marxist-led universities. It is very hard to shake the inevitable mind clamp!
Here is a comment of an intimidated believer(?) on that blog, despairing Ken Ham’s Noah’s Ark Park, illustrating that fear of peers!
They have an article about Bronze Age Doggerland, in which they deplore empirical Flood history and Flood science that only has ONE Ice Age and far more recent, melting around 1500 BC.
Archaeologists have been surprised by the strange finding of ancient Roman coins, buried in the ruins of a castle located in Japan. The four copper coins were unearthed from the soil beneath Katsuren Castle on Okinawa Island.
“Scientists believe!” What do they believe? That it “could be!” Could be what? “3.77 billion years old!” Not 3.76, nor 3.78, mind you. No! 3.77 billion! That is 3.770.000.000 years ago! An awful long time ago when there were no witnesses around to verify their hypothesis.
And what is their “science” based on? Oh, on “the geologic time scale” that is based on “key fossils“, which are dated by the layers they are found in, and the layers in turn are dated by the key fossils that are found in them. Very nifty circular reasoning. But to these “scientists” that doesn’t matter, because their hypothesis is supported by International Academe who has long rubber-stamped Darwinian theory to virtually be a “law of nature” because “there is no more debate” on their “science by consensus” and support of MS Media. Continue reading Nature “Scientists believe rock fossils could be 3.77 billion years old.” (Not 3.78 mind you!)→
By: Mike Adams
“In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”- George Orwell.
We live in a time of great deceit, where those who dare to utter the most important truths are subject to the most extreme vilification of all. A little more than a month ago, I released a mini-documentary that details this very important phenomenon observed across our modern society. (That video is shown below.)
As you watch it, remember that societies which celebrate truth are societies which are moving forward, while societies that punish truth are actually devolving and regressing. The overarching pattern found in today’s society is that those who speak the truth are punished and destroyed, while those who lie and deceive are celebrated and empowered.
As I state in the documentary video:
“You can actually start to gauge how important someone is to human knowledge by looking at how aggressively they are vilified. If someone is contributing really nothing to humankind and the expansion of knowledge and the raising of awareness and consciousness, they are completely ignored by the status quo. If they are destroying human knowledge, and destroying the culture, and destroying ethics and morality, they will be celebrated… But if you are someone who deliberately wants to help awaken humanity or move human progress forward, or expand knowledge, awareness… expand scientific understanding or ask new questions of science to move science forward, you will be attacked, you will be defamed, you will be destroyed, you will be de-funded.”
In a remarkable – for its honesty and frankness – statement on the intellectual rot within America’s Ivory Towers,Stanford University Provost John Etchemendy lay bare the challenges that higher education face in the coming, increasingly divisive, years.