Tag Archives: Re-education?

Is Wikipedia Reliable? – By Questions For Corbett

ANCIENT PATRIARCHS INTRO:   We have posted other articles on the Wikipedia scam, especially related to True History or Propaganda. Wicked Pedia ONLY promotes Darwinian History, which in my view is the greatest propaganda trophy of ALL of the New World Order, as it has destroyed and is still destroying the reality of the Spiritual universe in the minds of many people all over the planet, who were propagandised by this very unscientific theory that promoted the so-called Tree of Life, where all the gazillions of species & kinds originated from each other via the first “one cell micro organism”, from an explosion of a very small dot from NOTHING, NO-WHERE, & NO-TIME, into a gas planet turning cold into rocks & rain that eroded them into a ‘primordial soup’!

And lo and behold it produced a very complicated computer code not just made up of a binary of 1’s and 0’s…, NO sirreee, but instead made up from FOUR elements, A,T,C, & G from which all the gazillions of trillions of fancy proteins which constitute and constructed all forms of organic life on this pretty blue planet, were coded there in. WOW! What an incredible non-planned happenstance!

And how?! ALL that was necessary for it ALL to come together was… CHANCE & TIME! LOTS of it. Nothing less than pure luck! And of course most of you believe it. Why? Because Wicked Pedia says so whenever you look up something for example related to History, anything contrary to their Materialist, Humanist, Marxist, Atheist worldview is put down as “MYTH!” And no Euhemerism is ever allowed, mind you.

Even, believe it or not, Mr. James Corbett of the good video below about WP, himself surely still believes he originated from a “BIG BANG” from NOTHING & NOWHERE that resulted in our Universe, with that uniform static starry sky by which his ancient Sumerian patriarchs so securely sailed, and from which explosion emerged the “primordial soup” that mutated into evermore complex coded information that finally spiraled – of itself! – into our DNA helix and somehow formed his French forefathers in Gaul, some of whom  finally migrated to Canada and produced little James from a tiny egg inside his Mum and that tiny wiggly sperm from his Daddy with that intelligently designed flagellum at its little bottom, into his mother’s holy of holies, and voila… out came Mr. James Corbett!

Now how do I know he believes that? Because he never talks about that conspiracy! Even though he talks about everything else under the conspiratorial sun, as I know because I follow him, but NEVER EVER about the greatest conspiracy that emasculated Mankind or rather castrated his spiritual LOGOS!

Well, I don’t totally blame him. I once believed the same, and was convinced that I came from some kind of primate monkey who birthed some cavemen who began to hunt and gather and slowly grew smart enough to build a ship with a crew who dared to loose sight of land in “1492 when Columbus sailed the ocean blue“! That had NEVER EVER happened before, in spite of all those ancient polygonal megaliths and pyramids all over the world that are virtually identical. But, ‘NO’, says Wicked Pedia, ‘NOBODY ever crossed the oceans before 1492, because that is “pseudo science”,’ and if you look up ‘the Great Flood’ in WP, you are directed to a page called the “Flood Myth”, even though over 700 legends from every race, tribe, nation, and civilisation under the sun believed that their 8 primo patriarchs survived a global Flood.

So even though James Corbett sees by a little light in his carnal mind that WP sucks at lots of truth, he is still partially deceived by that greatest hoax of all time in history, itself. So  pray for poor James that he might see the Light. Nevertheless, he does see through Climate Change, and 9-11, and Corona Clampdown, and other propaganda-s, but he is still in Lala Land as far as our origins. So have mercy and DO enjoy his video below. We love ya James!

Continue reading Is Wikipedia Reliable? – By Questions For Corbett

Wikipedia: A Disinformation Operation?

Published: March 2020; Languages: DE, EN, ES, FR, NL, RO

Wikipedia is generally thought of as an open, transparent, and mostly reliable online encyclopedia. Yet upon closer inspection, this turns out not to be the case.

In fact, the English Wikipedia with its 9 billion worldwide page views per month is governed by just 500 active administrators, whose real identity in many cases remains unknown.

Moreover, studies have shown that 80% of all Wikipedia content is written by just 1% of all Wikipedia editors, which again amounts to just a few hundred mostly unknown people.

Obviously, such a non-transparent and hierarchical structure is susceptible to corruption and manipulation, the notorious “paid editors” hired by corporations being just one example.

Indeed, already in 2007, researchers found that CIA and FBI employees were editing Wikipedia articles on controversial topics including the Iraq war and the Guantanamo military prison.

Also in 2007, researchers found that one of the most active and influential English Wikipedia administrators, called “Slim Virgin”, was in fact a former British intelligence informer.

More recently, another highly prolific Wikipedia editor going by the false name of “Philip Cross” turned out to be linked to UK intelligence as well as several mainstream media journalists.

In Germany, one of the most aggressive Wikipedia editors was exposed, after a two-year legal battle, as a political operative formerly serving in the Israeli army as a foreign volunteer. Continue reading Wikipedia: A Disinformation Operation?

Charles Darwin’s Hidden Agenda for Science – (re post)

The standard, long held view of the connection between Darwin’s religion and his theory is wrong. Supposedly he was a Christian who studied at Cambridge to become a minister. But then, during his voyage around the world on the Beagle, the scientific facts persuaded him to believe in evolution and give up his Christian faith. However, an examination of the various influences upon the youthful Charles Darwin reveals an entirely different story.

Family Background.

Charles’ grandfather, Erasmus, a successful and wealthy physician in the 18th century, wrote the book, Zoonomia (Laws of Life), which portrays a pantheistic world in which all life and species evolved. Erasmus’ close friend, industrialist Josiah Wedgwood I, embraced Unitarian theology. Erasmus’ son and Charles’ father, Robert Darwin, also a wealthy physician, probably an atheist, married Susannah Wedgwood. Other marriage ties between the two families followed. Not surprisingly, Darwin males generally were freethinkers, following the Unitarian, pantheistic and atheistic views of their principal sires.

The Son, His Father and His Wife.

Charles Darwin, was born in 1809. His dominant, atheistic father, Robert, advised him to conceal his unorthodox beliefs from his wife. Should he predecease her this would spare her from unnecessary grief because of her spouse’s dying an unbeliever. Charles never spoke publicly about his religious views. However, before he married Emma Wedgwood in 1839 he told her about his rejection of Christian faith. Though probably not herself evangelical, she was nevertheless pious, and the rather gross unbelief of her husband was painful to her. But during his life and even after his death she protected his reputation by concealing his unbelief.

Charles’ Education

Robert Darwin sent his son off to Edinburgh University in 1825. The sixteen-year-old boy found himself in a university community which was in a continual ferment of radicalism of all sorts advanced by dissenters from the Anglican church, freethinkers, anti-Christians and atheists, materialists and evolutionists. Evolution was in the air. Most influential in this phase of Charles Darwin’s life was Robert Grant, a dozen years his senior. Holding the medical degree from Edinburgh, he had made himself the leading British authority in invertebrate zoology. Grant was an avowed atheist, and evolutionist, and also a social and political radical. On zoological field trips with Grant young Charles listened to his persuasive private lecturing but kept his own counsel. Deeply interested in biological science, Charles abhorred medicine The sight of blood sickened him. After two years he returned home without a degree.

Disappointed, father Robert Darwin decided to send him off to Cambridge University for a degree in theology, after which he could purchase for him a “living” in an Anglican country church. There he could be a sportsman, a scholar, or an amateur naturalist, supported by a government stipend for life. Charles dutifully signed onto the Thirty-Nine Articles of the Church of England and entered Cambridge. He surely saw the hypocrisy in an atheist father’s financing his son’s preparation to be a minister of the gospel. Continue reading Charles Darwin’s Hidden Agenda for Science – (re post)

In Two Weeks, “Mathematical Challenges” to Darwin Gets Half a Million Views

ANCIENT PATRIARCHS EDITOR: If it wasn’t for the continuous, voluminous, massive stream of highly illustrated propaganda, daily emanating from the official mainstream TV, Hollywood, Magazines, internet media, academia, Wikipedia spouts, and most scholastic institutes, Yes, they are all in on it. Darwinism would have died a very long time ago. In spite of the few important Darwinian apostates like Dr. Gelernter Darwinism is still very alive in the minds of the uninformed who are gullible enough to fall for the official paradigm. And precisely that shows that this entire flooding of the minds of the masses is totally un-natural. Of course we knew that already for a long time not only about Biology, but about many other fields in Science, Politics, and especially finances. But lets not digress. Mankind is perhaps not “brainwashed” which would exclude free will, but they are definitely not well informed — on purpose — and you don’t need a aluminum hat to come to such a true conclusion. Truth is… the majority of Humanity is flooded by lies. and that is the reason why things are not getting better but worse, as a network of lies fabricate slavery and prisoners, where as the TRUTH does set us free! Are you? ENJOY THE VIDEO!

David Klinghoffer | @d_klinghoffer  August 9, 2019, 12:00 PM

In Florence, Italy, back in June, Stephen Meyer, David Gelernter, and David Berlinski got together with Peter Robinson of the Hoover Institution to talk about “Mathematical Challenges to Darwin’s Theory of Evolution.” The episode of Hoover’s interview series, Uncommon Knowledge, has been up now for a little over two weeks and has already amassed more than half a million views on YouTube. Actually, the precise number is 522,800, since July 22. Not bad!

The occasion for their conversation, a delightful hour in length, is Gelernter’s recent essay in The Claremont Review of Books explaining his apostasy from Darwinism. The renowned Yale computer scientist and polymath attributes his change of mind to reading books by Meyer (Darwin’s Doubt, Signature in the Cell) and Berlinski (The Deniable Darwin).

This is a great and quite funny interaction among vivid personalities and profound scientific and humanistic thinkers. As I’ve pointed out already, the interest lies not only in Dr. Gelernter’s personal journey toward evolution skepticism but in his testimony about how Darwinism is enforced among scientists and scholars in American universities.

“You take your life in your hands to challenge it intellectually,” says Professor Gelernter, who ought to know. “They will destroy you if you challenge it.” As our friend Denyse O’Leary notes, this comes from someone who has survived not just life in academia, but a terror attack directed at him personally, by the Unabomber, that cost him the use of a hand and an eye. When someone with that background tells you Darwinists will “destroy you” for criticizing their theory, or they’ll try to do so, I’d take that seriously.

If you missed it, see also Robinson and Berlinski in an outstanding one-on-one discussion about The Deniable Darwin.

Correction: Ha, in the time it took me to write this post, another 500+ people watched Robinson, Meyer, Gelernter, and Berlinski. The number of views now stands at 523,314.

SOURCE

Recommended

Wikipedia and Lucifer

By Kevin Boyle

Wikipedia calls Stephen Meyer and Michael Egnor “pseudo-scientists” because they both publicly support the idea of ‘intelligent design’.

‘RationalWiki’ goes further calling Egnor “a promotor of neuro-woo”. [RationalWiki has a “board” of directors who hide behind fake names]

Egnor and Meyer are modern “heretics” who speak out against the dominant establishment scientific doctrine, i.e. ‘materialism’, which asserts that:

Consciousness is an epiphenomenon of electro-chemical activity in the brains of sentient beings. Beyond these neural signals there is no consciousness. Whatsoever.

Thus the most mysterious phenomenon in the universe is reduced to being a by-product of sodium and potassium ions acting across cell membranes and there we have it; it is not consciousness that causes body chemistry, it is body chemistry that causes consciousness.

John Cleese quotes George Orwell regarding this issue when he says here that:

“Only an intellectual is capable of believing such nonsense.”

The question is … why does Wikipedia and every other establishment instrument in the public domain put so much effort into forbidding the idea that there is a ‘God’ that has created the universe?

The answers are fairly obvious but worth stating:

The establishment wants (and needs) us to listen to and obey its authority only.

The world is ruled by Luciferians who want and intend to displace God. They are, essentially, thieves who want to own it all and in order to achieve their goal they must persuade us to silence the voice of God, the Logos, within our very being. Along with everything else they decide what kind of drama we get to watch (e.g. anything on Netflix or, perhaps, predictably PC, arse-aching BBC sh*t like this)

God is love. The love of self and other. The affirmation of all.

Lucifer is love of self and rejection of all that does not serve love of self.

It begins with the illusion that self is source but even the self-love in Lucifer is God’s. Lucifer turns love against its true source. Free beings can do that. We are all capable of buying into the illusion (which is, literally nothing) to the point that we reject and act against the only thing that is real in us.

We, here on earth, need to recognise and know that which is believed by all in heaven.

That we are sources of nothing.

That all the good in us flows in from Heaven, and

All evil in us flows in from hell.

Why would people of faith pray (or agnostics desire the common good) if they did not know this already? The ‘Logos’ (the Divine within) is at work in us whether we are aware of it or not.

In the words of Emanuel Swedenborg, ‘Heaven and Hell’ §302

“I have talked with angels about the conjunction of heaven with the human race, and I said that, while the man of the Church declares that all good is from God, and that angels are with man, yet few believe that angels are conjoined to man, still less that they are in his thought and affection. To this the angels replied that they know that there is such a belief and even such a mode of speaking in the world, and especially, to their surprise, within the Church, where yet there is the Word to teach men about heaven and its conjunction with man.

Nevertheless, there IS such a conjunction that man is unable to think the least thing apart from the spirits adjoined to him, and on this his spiritual life depends. They said that the cause of ignorance of this matter is man’s belief that he lives from himself, without a connection with the Creator of life; and that he does not know that this connection exists by means of the heavens; and yet if that connection were broken man would instantly fall down dead.

If man believed, as is really true, that all good is from the Lord and all evil from hell, he would not make the good in him a matter of merit nor would evil be imputed to him; for he would then look to the Lord in all the good he thinks and does, and all the evil that inflows would be cast down to hell whence it comes. But because man does not believe that there is any influx into him either from heaven or from hell, and so supposes that all the things that he thinks and wills are in himself, and therefore from himself, he appropriates the evil to himself, and the inflowing good he defiles with merit.”

Michael Egnor: The Evidence against Materialism

Stephen Meyer: God and the Origin of the Universe

Tom Campbell: The Implications of Virtual Reality for Humanity

Source

The Manipulation of ‘Academic’ History – Written by the Winners!

Mr. D. Irving on British and German history during World War II, and how history is written by the ‘winners’. He describes how normy historians all quote each other and perpetuate their own hypothesis and lies! This is a very powerful expose of how universities and its established institutions are corrupting REAL history. Be sure to listen to this two hour presentation on World War II and Churchill as an ordinary war criminal. ‘ENJOY’ some true history. If you have trouble following the spoken English, turn on the CC button below the video. [WELL, Poutube censured & deleted the first one, as you can see, so I put an other one below, that’s been up for 4 years. let me know  when they take THAT one down.]

David Irving – Winston Churchill And His Secret Communications With President Roosevelt.

Setterfield Rocks the Gravitational Universe Boat With Plasma Theory & Repercussions on History Time of Universe

We should be open to new ideas, otherwise we tie ourselves to old outdated models, scientific traditions, and authoritarian academic powers that should be updated, thrown out, and forced to admit they are obsolete. Does it happen? No! History shows how hard it is to change worldviews, paradigms, settled “science’, academic traditions, and as a result the popular degenerated views of Man in the masses who drink in mainstream media dis-info like water. (Don’t be like ’em!)

I had heard about Barry Setterfield in connection to Dodwells’ research about the 2345 BC catastrophe (not updated yet), which I – due to my ignorance of more facts – wrongly equated with the year of the Flood. Now I know – thanks to this research by a smart fellow – that the actual time of the Flood was around 500 years earlier, around 3000 BC, and 2345 BC may rather be connected to the division of the continents.

But Barry Setterfield is really rocking the boat, as his plasma model view of the “Electric Universe” is slowly pushing out the gravitational model. Not just that, but he also has been injecting new theories of the geological models that are upsetting the conventional Creationist AND the Darwinian time models of the Universe.

But before I get into that aspect I recommend you to watch his 4 videos of the Plasmic Universe below, and if I get time I will post the 3 catastrophe model of geology below in time to come. So come back, unless you go to his channel and watch them for your self.
(TIP: You can speed up the video in YT Settings up to 2X the original) part 1.

Barry Setterfield from Genesis Science Research presents the first of a two-part series that explains some new developments in astronomy. These developments have the potential of changing a lot of the way astronomers and others are seeing things “out there.”
part 2

Second part of a two-part series that explains some new developments in astronomy. These developments have the potential of changing a lot of the way astronomers and others are seeing things “out there.”   part 3

Barry Setterfield discusses his journey of discovery about the speed of light and astronomical anomalies, from his days at University to the most recent developments, proving that the speed of light has slowed down since the Beginning of TIME!
part 4

History is Written by the Winners! [Also Ancient History by the same control freaks]

Although this video is about World War I  history, yet the question is raised in general, “Who teaches the teachers who teach the students?” And “who chooses the peers of the peer review system? And “who chooses the professors who teach the teachers?” And what influence do the foundations and sponsors of universities have on the academic standards of truth? And who do they represent? Corbett brings out the main culprit of history falsification, Cecil Rhodes of the “Rogue Scholars”, ahem.. I mean, Rhodes Scholars of the Round Table secret society that has ruled England for a century. England has also been the center of spreading the false science of Darwinism into the rest of the world. And that dear Ladies & Gentlemen, has screwed up ANCIENT History BIG time! (See our other articles) MUST WATCH!

Continue reading History is Written by the Winners! [Also Ancient History by the same control freaks]

Universities Have Become Globalists Propaganda Organizations

Via Paul Craig Roberts.org – Dec 10, 2018

Universities as massive Western, globalist propaganda tools

Hanne Herland — hannenabintuherland.com Dec 5, 2018

Historian and philosopher of science Thomas S. Kuhn garnered attention in the 1960s when he showed how subjective much of the research at universities really is. The dominant worldview strongly influences the opinions of professors and students alike.

The individual scientist is often much more influenced by the ideologies of his time and subjected to a peer pressure to reach the conclusions he knows will be applauded. He tends to end up interpreting his subject matter in line with the trends.

In “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,” Kuhn explains that in science, the dominant understanding of reality builds on a series of assumptions. It becomes the intellectual’s role to produce evidence that supports the dominant academic consensus, which Kuhn calls the dominant paradigm. [AP editor: Darwinian materialism!] Continue reading Universities Have Become Globalists Propaganda Organizations

Scientists Baffled by New Discoveries! Darwinian Evolution Fairytale! Scientists Abandon Theory

Lawrence Krauss — an unpleasant smarmy individual – who claims to be a scientist, rejects empirical scientific facts because he is stuck in an atheist Marxist narrative and mindset that refuses to listen or debate solid proofs and findings. He is like an academic Antifa, an Antiacadem, so to speak. Or you can call him an Antiscienc. Antiscienca don’t do science. They intimidate, verbally bully, & use straw-man slogans like “creationism” to throw debates off course. No fairness, no listening, no consideration of pertinent facts, not even cordial politeness to not interrupt or monopolise a conversation. He “owns the truth.” Yeah right. MUST WATCH!