The New Zealand Mystery

A DISCOVERY – STARTLING, BUT TRUE
A little while ago I hinted at a remarkable discovery made on the far
side of our planet, in New Zealand. This may be the most unusual story I will ever get a chance to share with you. The connecting links may seem bizarre – but they are true… every one of them.Even if you’re not the slightest bit religious, you should find the following twist of events fascinating. Living as a skeptic for many years, I never expected to be breaking this kind of news to you.

THE DOCUMENT ON MY DESKI just wish you were with me here today. Because at this moment, on my desk – yes, right before my eyes – sits a 1,985 year old document. Until recently, we never knew it existed. But it has a clearly trackable history. Everything that follows is true history – supported now by solid archaeological exhibits. Did you get that? Please read it again.

You can’t get closer to an event than this report. On April 27, 31 AD,in Jerusalem, the eyewitness author of the document found himself forced into a key role following the execution of Jesus Christ.

Also fitting strangely into this bizarre chain of events is a well-known
archaeological treasure, the Ark of the Covenant.

Giant human skeleton found in Pulau Upeh Malacca Malaysia

Giants, giants, giants… everywhere!

Now in Malacca in an island Pulau Upeh in Malaysia, Did you ever hear from academics in the history department that evidence of giants had been found in South East Asia? Most certainly not! Not from mainstream historians that is.

But Malaysia is surely not the first place giant skeletons or graves have been found. Skeletons have been found all over the Pacific and graves, like in Rotuma (see top picture), sightings even in the Solomon Islands, as well as the find of one of the most giant skulls ever, in the Aleutian islands, and giant remains in Hawaii. See news article below:

Dragon Evidence Found in Romanian mountain cave & proof of cover up plus FAKES in museums to discredit!

Amazing Dragon Evidence: Found in Romanian Mountain Cave & Proof of Cover Up. Is there a conspiracy to cover up dragons and giants? If the data don’t fit the Evolutionary Darwinian narrative, it has to be suppressed and it DOES get suppressed! There are even produced gate-keeping fake websites that Google refers to on its first pages with fake dragon or giants’ information! If gullible truthseekers believe the obviously fake sites like Snopes & Worldnewsdailyreport, they will be taken for a ride. OUR true pages of Ancientpatriarchs you won’t see on the first search engines’ page.
VIDEO MUST WATCH! (NB: I don’t necessarily support all the videos of this channel as I haven’t watched them all)

The Canaanite Altar Below Jekyll Island Hotel of Federal Reserve Infamy

Ever wonder why our money system is so corrupt and evil? G. Edward Griffin once said, “”The Federal Reserve is a hybrid organization. It’s a partnership between the Federal Government and the private banks. When you look at it deeper than that, its essence is neither as a government agency nor a private company. In reality, it is a cartel.”

Notice, G. Edward Griffin says that the Federal Reserve is a “hybrid organization.” I doubt he even knows just how true that statement apparently is. Listen to this interview Rob Skiba did with Tim Bence and discover just how dark the origin if this “Creature From Jeckyll Island” really is.

The short version of the long radio show, cause the ‘preacher’ is kind of long winded – as usual – and overly spiritual.

The entire radio interview with Tim Bence…

Shocking Fact: Wikipedia Administrators in Disgraceful Revisionist Cover-up of Darwin’s Lies About Matthew

Shocking Fact: Wikipedia Administrators in Disgraceful Revisionist Cover-up of Darwin’s Lies About Matthew  By Mike Sutton.

In this blog post, I stand boldly in the field to ask Wikipedia to explain why, when it is forever fund-begging form the general public, it pays administrators to hide behind pseudonyms to gleefully and systematically delete significant, embarrassing, 100 per cent proven, facts regarding Charles Darwin’s dishonesty about who really did read Patrick Matthew’s book before he replicated the original ideas in it without citing Matthew.