Live Science Magazine reported that English archaeologists did indeed discover an overwhelming genetic similarity between the Canaanites of around 1500 BC and modern day Lebanese. They were so surprised! How inane and a-scientific can Darwinians get! We could have told them that fact without an expensive DNA test.
If they had read all the ancient chronicles and historians from that time and onward, they would have easily known and not been surprised at all, that they indeed descended from their patriarch Canaan!, and that not just because “Moses & Joshua wrote about it“, but these ‘scientists’ despise simple Euhemerist explanations!
Continue reading “Live Science” Finds Canaanite DNA in the Lebanese But Replaces Patriarch Canaan With a Darwinist “Stone Age Hunter Gatherer”
By Brian Forbes
I aim to show that any evidence presented to us will invariably take a back seat to the fertility of the soil in our hearts. It is our bias that determines what we are able to see and accept for evidence.
Bias defined: An emotional inclination to a particular view. Bias will often influence how you accept or reject evidence. Any position that has allowed for human evaluation will include bias. The question is not if there is bias. The question is what does your bias support. …and I can prove it.
Science is supposed to be based in objectivity – raw facts that lead to unemotional conclusions. The scientific method can be traced through:
- René Descartes – who rid his mind of all bias
- Francis Bacon – who described science in terms of cause and effect (experiments)
- Karl Popper – falsifiability
They defined how we can know things without appealing to feeling. They set limits for “science” or knowledge. If it ain’t falsifiable,
it ain’t science. WATCH! Continue reading The Role of Bias in the Origins Debate – Video by Brian Forbes + Powerpoint
Michael Snyder — End of the American Dream April 25, 2017
In our world today, many have become convinced that science has all of the answers to humanity’s most important questions, and those that question the high priests of this new religion (scientists) are often accused of a form of “blasphemy”. We saw this clearly on display last Saturday when protesters gathered in Washington D.C. and in about 600 other cities worldwide for “the March for Science”. Those of us that are skeptical and that don’t necessarily buy into the scientific orthodoxy of the day were accused of “ignoring facts” and being “climate deniers” by various speakers at these protests. But of course the truth is that scientific theories have always been in flux all throughout history, and this will continue to be the case as time moves forward.
Google defines science as “the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment.” Personally, I very much believe in the scientific method because it has helped us to understand a great deal about how our world operates.
But in recent years, many in the scientific community have elevated “theory” to the same level as “fact”, and those that dare to question the most cherished theories of the scientific priesthood are often persecuted greatly. Just ask all of the professors that have been “purged” from universities all across the United States for challenging conventional wisdom on climate change or the origin of life.
I have studied the scientific evidence that both sides have produced, and I have become entirely convinced that climate change is not primarily caused by human activity. Does that make me a “heretic” according to these science zealots? Continue reading Science Is Not God, So Why Are People Trying To Turn It Into A Religion?
Dr. David Berlinsky Refutes Evolution
Atheist professor destroys evolution
Dr. Richard Lumsden – professor of parasitology and cell biology at Tulane University in Louisiana. Served as Dean of the Graduate school of biological sciences. Published about 90 peer-reviewed papers and was awarded the Henry Baldwin Ward medal for his work in parasitology.
Professor Exposes Impossibilities of Evolution
THE LIE THAT CREPT IN UNAWARES. Must watch!
THE VEHICLE THAT SUPPORTED AND PUSHED IT FORWARD..
THE POWERS BEHIND IT?
Maybe next time…
ABOVE: RED-HAIRED GIANT SKULL FROM NAZCA PERU
Picture of a red-brown-haired Bigfoot, shot dead by a hunter.
Another Bigfoot video in a long range of sightings in North America (and other countries), appeared on Russia Today yesterday, yet seldom is a connection made with the many 19th century archaeological finds of giant skeletons in North America, way before Indians filled the continent.
The so-called Mound Peoples in the Mississippi basin, buried their dead in mounds many of which were dug up in the 19 hundreds. Inside many giant skeletons were found as you can read in our article on giant skeleton newspaper reports – including the New York Times – where it was said that officials and scientists of the Smithsonian Institute came and collected the skeletons for scientific research, but then they were never heard of again. If you ask the Smithsonian today, they “have no record” of these many reported archaeological finds. Continue reading Sasquatch & Big Foot! Another Official Suppression of A Degenerated Giants Race
Former CBS Reporter Exposes Media Lies, Internet Shills & Astroturfing – MUST SEE!!! She speaks how Corporations warp our perception of products, agendas, narratives, politics, etc, via all kinds of forms of gross deception. She completely trashes Wikipedia’s reliability. One author was not allowed to change facts on WP because WP said, “He is not the best source on himself!” On hiS OWN BOOK! For Crying Out Loud!
And this is supposed to be a source that most historical researchers consult and trust? Yes! Wikipedia’s anonymous editors – powerful agents with no accountability – twist, distort, change truth, mold minds, push their agenda, and manipulate their users and HISTORICAL researchers. WHY HISTORY? What is there to be manipulated? First watch this unusual honest TED Talk! Continue reading Ex CBS Reporter on Media Lies, Internet Shills & Astroturfing Trashes Wikipedia! – So is Historical Science! Warped!
Surely Charles Darwin, if he had encountered this amazing strange sea creature during his trip to South America to find the finches evolving, would have classed this in the “Tree of Life” as related to the grass mower or the vacuum cleaner, except that it doesn’t use electricity.
Well, the Darwinists are going to have a very hard time to find missing links in the geological timeline and column! because this creature has no bones. So it is a NON vertebrae! Ha! What a crock of feces the theory is.
foul mouth below
This giant dragon-fly fossil compared to a human hand is collosal. You would quickly seek shelter if one came flying at you. Wouldn’t you? So when did they live? Well, obviously not in what we call ‘written history’. But they must have lived sometime, because we have their fossils! And why are they so much bigger than today?
Normally in Darwinism things grow from small to bigger, but according to this fossil, dragon flies once upon a time were huge while they are now a mere 2-3 inches long. Like this giant leaf fossil below. So what happened?
Continue reading What Explains Giant Dragon Flies & Vegetation While Giant Humans Are Denied?
IF a billion people played the lottery and you’d win, that would be a one-in-a-billion chance! But if you would win it every day — which all of us normal common sense people know that that’s impossible of course! — such a chance is impossible to mathematically express in a number!
But believe it or not, Evolution hits the jackpot ALL THE TIME!!!
So every time you see this little sign, know that the statistical chance that such an instance would take place, is even many billions time smaller than one-in-a-billion! — Unbelievably impossibly infinitesimally SMALL! — The Jurassic Jackpot? Continue reading How Evolution ALWAYS Hits the Jackpot