THE VIDEO AT THE END OF THE ARTICLE IS VERY WORTH WATCHING!!!
Brien Foerster has done tons of research on elongated skulls and this video shows many of the results of his work. Elongated skulls are NOT the result of head-binding cultures, as Darwinian trained archaeologists surmise, as the elongated skulls are elongated from the womb, as the video will show you, and they don’t have the normal sutures on top of the skulls but are closed on top, apart from all the other differences and anomalies. The mystery of course is where did these elongated skull humans originated from?
As much as I admire Brien Foerster’s tenacious research and passion to show (qu)academia that they are …
- obfuscating true research into these anomalous skulls
- denying early oceanic crossings of humans & these kind of humans originating in Europe or Middle East around the Caspian and Black Seas..
- Ignoring these skulls by NOT subjecting them to rigorous & honest genetic DNA analysis..
- confusing the later ‘Indian’ Incas to these skulls via their bogus head binding theory.
- etc. etc.
I draw different conclusions than Foerster because we each come from totally different worldviews and scientific paradigms. I will explain:
Brian Foerster, — as many of his fellow travellers, like Matt Childress, Graham Hancock, and other “megalithomaniacs” – as they call themselves — are perhaps alternative in some ways, but still very mainstream in paradigm, in that they are still full-blown Darwinians, inspite of the facts and top scientists that have shredded this bogus theory as a total fantasy and untenable science. See our articles on the subject here on our site. Continue reading The Latest Elongated Skull Video & Our Different Conclusions than Brien Foerster