In a remarkable – for its honesty and frankness – statement on the intellectual rot within America’s Ivory Towers, Stanford University Provost John Etchemendy lay bare the challenges that higher education face in the coming, increasingly divisive, years.
The Threat From Within
Universities are a fundamental force of good in the world. At their best, they mine knowledge and understanding, wisdom and insight, and then freely distribute these treasures to society at large. Theirs is not a monopoly on this undertaking, but in the concentration of effort and single-mindedness of purpose, they are truly unique institutions. If Aristotle is right that what defines a human is rationality, then they are the most distinctive, perhaps the pinnacle, of human endeavors.
I share this thought to remind us all why we do what we do – why we care so much about Stanford and what it represents. But I also say it to voice a concern. Universities are under attack, both from outside and from within.
The threat from outside is apparent. Potential cuts in federal funding would diminish our research enterprise and our ability to fund graduate education. Taxing endowments would limit the support we can give to faculty and the services we can provide our students. Indiscriminate travel restrictions would impede the free exchange of ideas and scholars. All of these threats have intensified in recent years – and recent months have given them a reality that is hard to ignore.
But I’m actually more worried about the threat from within. Over the years, I have watched a growing intolerance at universities in this country – not intolerance along racial or ethnic or gender lines – there, we have made laudable progress. Rather, a kind of intellectual intolerance, a political one-sidedness, that is the antithesis of what universities should stand for. It manifests itself in many ways: in the intellectual monocultures that have taken over certain disciplines; in the demands to disinvite speakers and outlaw groups whose views we find offensive; in constant calls for the university itself to take political stands. We decry certain news outlets as echo chambers, while we fail to notice the echo chamber we’ve built around ourselves.
This results in a kind of intellectual blindness that will, in the long run, be more damaging to universities than cuts in federal funding or ill-conceived constraints on immigration. It will be more damaging because we won’t even see it: We will write off those with opposing views as evil or ignorant or stupid, rather than as interlocutors worthy of consideration. We succumb to the all-purpose ad hominem because it is easier and more comforting than rational argument. But when we do, we abandon what is great about this institution we serve.
It will not be easy to resist this current. As an institution, we are continually pressed by faculty and students to take political stands, and any failure to do so is perceived as a lack of courage. But at universities today, the easiest thing to do is to succumb to that pressure. What requires real courage is to resist it. Yet when those making the demands can only imagine ignorance and stupidity on the other side, any resistance will be similarly impugned.
The university is not a megaphone to amplify this or that political view, and when it does it violates a core mission. Universities must remain open forums for contentious debate, and they cannot do so while officially espousing one side of that debate.
But we must do more. We need to encourage real diversity of thought in the professoriate, and that will be even harder to achieve. It is hard for anyone to acknowledge high-quality work when that work is at odds, perhaps opposed, to one’s own deeply held beliefs. But we all need worthy opponents to challenge us in our search for truth. It is absolutely essential to the quality of our enterprise.
I fear that the next few years will be difficult to navigate. We need to resist the external threats to our mission, but in this, we have many friends outside the university willing and able to help. But to stem or dial back our academic parochialism, we are pretty much on our own. The first step is to remind our students and colleagues that those who hold views contrary to one’s own are rarely evil or stupid, and may know or understand things that we do not. It is only when we start with this assumption that rational discourse can begin, and that the winds of freedom can blow.
3 thoughts on “Intellectual Intolerance – Stunning Speech From Stanford University Provost Exposes “The Threat From Within””
Great post – all people in the education system and education industry should look at this.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks. Please come back to enjoy all our true history articles.
I am not so sure about that, in for example the proper vetting of the WORD! AND in the case of DARWINISM! Because, whether you realise it or not yet, Darwinism as a spiritual Weapon of Mass Deception -WMD- turned out to be the deadliest in their evil mind-screwing ammunition! IT was singularly responsible for the falling away of hundreds of millions of believers in the past, AND today!
Of course, God allowed and even SENT this grand delusion to test the hearts of those who have NO love for the truth, but it still stumbles many new and weak believers. For if Jesus Christ Himself believed in the Flood and a recent Creation of Earth, and NOT in impossible Darwinist morphing of DNA of species, then HOW can they progress in faith if it is not properly explained that there is NO evidence whatsoever in Biology, Geology, and especially not in Historical Science, as we try to do here at Ancient Patriarchs!
And so these perps who hold Darwinian “views contrary to our own” ARE definitely evil IF they purposely spread lies to undermine faith in God, and/or stupid because they fully ignore that DNA is a far more intelligent code, a gazillion times more complicated than the source code of even the most nifty computer programs. They are willingly ignorant! And the same goes for those who take away faith in the infallibility of SCRIPTURE, or those who spread or promote erroneous teachings like that. They appear not to have the fear of God. I’d be scared to death to promote stuff that could stumble weaker brethren.
Thanks for your comment.
love & peace
LikeLiked by 1 person